I've been looking at foldable solar cell supplies. They come in
approximately 10, 15, and 20 watt sizes. The cost difference between the 10.4 (.75 amps) and 15.6 (1 amp) watt units is $20 and the difference between the 15 and 20 (1.4 amps) watt units is $45 respectively) I can see that getting the most Amps one can afford would be good if you were going to run your gear (K2) directly off solar - with (Don's) controller of course. But if you are running off a battery so you go solar cells to controller to battery to rig then it seems if you get a solar unit that delivers more amps then you'd want to push into the battery for charging, that you are spending money for a "High End" that you would never use. So if a charging amps of .5 amps is recommended, and given the variability of solar output, 1 amp would be reliable - then would 1.4 even be recommended? That is, it is one thing to justify the extra cost vs the extra performance. But if the extra performance doesn't matter, or many isn't even desired, then that is an overriding reason not to buy more then needed. Does that make any sense? That is, is the 15.5W array (1 amp) a better match to the 7 Ahr battery then the 20.8W (1.4 amp) array? Or should I go for as much solar amps as I can afford that will fit within the physical contraints of backpacking and kayaking? 73, Paul _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
That is, is the 15.5W array (1 amp) a much better match to the 7 Ahr battery then the 20.8W (1.4 amp) array? Or should I go for as much solar amps as I can afford that will fit within the physical contraints of backpacking and kayaking? Paul - I've been using solar power while camping for some time. The solar panel ratings are for perfect conditions (which is only a few hours a day at best). I use the Connecticut Solar backpacking panels - two 32 Watt panels and a Morning Star 15 amp controller - very nice equipment, but the panels are pretty heavy. With ideal conditions, I get about 5 amps output. However, typically, the figure is about 2.4 amps. You might want to factor that into your calculations. I'm also curious about the experiences of other people - perhaps I am doing something wrong. Tom W6EIJ _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Thomas Beltran wrote: >Or should I go for as much solar amps as I >can afford that will fit within the physical contraints of backpacking and >kayaking? > Yes! But I've used a few and found the 10watt Uniflex panel to be a good size vs output. It puts out abt half of rated (500ma) during normal timed use, but has been enough for the radios that most backpackers will carry. Prob the biggest rigs you would want to carry would be a K2, 703, 718 sized or Smaller like the DSW units... the larger only need aprox 700-1000ma per hour during normal 1:4 of TX vs RX(high use) . Good battery selection and a small charger will handle the larger rigs. As to the smaller like the DSW 's or AT's or KX1's the power draw is low enough to never run out of power with the a small charger and battery pack. Tom aa2vk _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |