Good Evening Everyone:
Hopefully, I'm about two and a half weeks from ordering a K2 with about four accessory kits. My question today is how much difference is there in performance between the KDSP2 and the KAF2? Is the KDSP2 worth the extra $140? I'm been using an IC-746pro for about a year and a half so I am familiar with the use of a DSP. Comments and thoughts would be appreciated. Jim, AB0UK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
I have had my K2/100 with KDSP2 for 4 months now and almost never use the
DSP. The stock filters in the K2 seem to work just as good, and often better, than the DSP filters but that is very much a matter of taste I think. I operate only cw and my comments apply only to cw mode. I like the DSP 'de-noiser' but I live in a pretty quiet environment and rarely think to use it. In a noisier environment it might be worth the cost of the DSP2 all by itself. As you can see this is a very incomplete response to your question. The answer depends a lot on your preferred modes and environment and I will be watching to see what others say. The bottom line for me, though, is that both the DSP or KAF2 are minor enhancements to an excellent receiver. Don K7FJ > Hopefully, I'm about two and a half weeks from > ordering a K2 with about four accessory kits. My > question today is how much difference is there in > performance between the KDSP2 and the KAF2? Is the > KDSP2 worth the extra $140? I'm been using an > IC-746pro for about a year and a half so I am familiar > with the use of a DSP. > > Comments and thoughts would be appreciated. > > Jim, AB0UK _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Don wrote:
> I have had my K2/100 with KDSP2 for 4 months now and almost never use the > DSP. The stock filters in the K2 seem to work just as good, and often > better, than the DSP filters but that is very much a matter of taste I think. > I operate only cw and my comments apply only to cw mode. I agree completely. I thought I would use the narrow DSP filter, but it really doesn't seem to increase the copiability of a CW signal over the basic crystal filters. > I like the DSP 'de-noiser' but I live in a pretty quiet environment and > rarely think to use it. In a noisier environment it might be worth the cost > of the DSP2 all by itself. I live in a relatively noisy location, and I have the denoiser on 100% of the time. I love it! Again, I only operate CW so I don't know if it's useful on SSB. -- 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Jim Harris-4
I have to disagree with the other guys .. I like the DSP in some
circumstances, it seems to be able to dig weak CW out of the noise on occasions where I can't hear it at all with the normal filter (and just barely with no filter). Where it really shines in on the digital modes .. I user the RTTY mode filters FL2/3 on RTTY and FL4 on PSK/Hell with great success. YMMV de John/W1RT On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:57:01 -0800 (PST), Jim Harris <[hidden email]> wrote: > Good Evening Everyone: > > Hopefully, I'm about two and a half weeks from > ordering a K2 with about four accessory kits. My > question today is how much difference is there in > performance between the KDSP2 and the KAF2? Is the > KDSP2 worth the extra $140? I'm been using an > IC-746pro for about a year and a half so I am familiar > with the use of a DSP. > > Comments and thoughts would be appreciated. > > Jim, AB0UK > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Jim Harris-4
The following is only my opinion...
I had the KAF2 and then built the KDSP2. The denoiser is ok, but I found that the DSP filters made the rig hard to listen to. This is more pronounced on SSB. The auto-notch was helpful, but it didn't make up for the irritating quality of the DSP filters. I tried all sorts of settings and just never thought it sounded right. I re-installed the KAF2 and I'm happier now. It's not perfect, but it doesn't distract from the QSO. If it makes any difference, I have had (and still have one) rigs with DSP from other manufacturers. I haven't been thrilled by any of them. My favorite filter is still an old Datong FL-3! So that's my take on it. I know lots of folks are happy with DSP. I just think it makes everything sound like a cheap cell phone. 73, Lonnie NY2LJ _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
I have yet to find settings where I can use the DSP NR on SSB; it sounds
like I'm listening through a pillow. Works great, otherwise! 73, David N2RDT -- "It takes brains. It's not like forward, where you can get away with scoring and not play defense... On defense you have to be thinking." ---Chris Chelios David M. Katinsky [hidden email] > From: <[hidden email]> > Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:24:28 -0500 > To: <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Which Audio Filter Kit? > > The following is only my opinion... > > I had the KAF2 and then built the KDSP2. The denoiser is ok, but I found that > the DSP filters made the rig hard to listen to. This is more pronounced on > SSB. The auto-notch was helpful, but it didn't make up for the irritating > quality of the DSP filters. I tried all sorts of settings and just never > thought it sounded right. I re-installed the KAF2 and I'm happier now. It's > not perfect, but it doesn't distract from the QSO. > > If it makes any difference, I have had (and still have one) rigs with DSP from > other manufacturers. I haven't been thrilled by any of them. My favorite > filter is still an old Datong FL-3! > > So that's my take on it. I know lots of folks are happy with DSP. I just think > it makes everything sound like a cheap cell phone. > > 73, > > Lonnie > NY2LJ > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by lonnie.m.juli
[hidden email] wrote:
> I had the KAF2 and then built the KDSP2. The denoiser is ok, but I found that the DSP filters made > the rig hard to listen to. This is more pronounced on SSB. The auto-notch was helpful, How about switching KDSP2 DSP-filters off? Use DSP filters only when conditions are requiring it. Is it possible? Rolf oh6kxl -- When replying my message, please - quote only necessary part of my text - write you reply under the quotation. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Jim Harris-4
I didn't think it was worth the trouble. I like having the KAF2 filters and they're tight enough so that I can get around most hetrodynes. If conditions were marginal, the de-noiser often made things worse, not better.
If you think about it: Sometimes you can copy weak signals best with the filters in the radio wide open and the filter between your ears doing all the work. I tried to like the DSP. I'm just more pleased with the KAF2. 73, Lonnie NY2LJ >>How about switching KDSP2 DSP-filters off? Use DSP filters only >>when conditions are requiring it. Is it possible? >>Rolf >>oh6kxl _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by lonnie.m.juli
For what it's worth, I never use it on fone .. but then I don't use
fone all that often :) de John/W1RT On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 15:24:28 -0500, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote: > The following is only my opinion... > > I had the KAF2 and then built the KDSP2. The denoiser is ok, but I found that the DSP filters made the rig hard to listen to. This is more pronounced on SSB. The auto-notch was helpful, but it didn't make up for the irritating quality of the DSP filters. I tried all sorts of settings and just never thought it sounded right. I re-installed the KAF2 and I'm happier now. It's not perfect, but it doesn't distract from the QSO. > > If it makes any difference, I have had (and still have one) rigs with DSP from other manufacturers. I haven't been thrilled by any of them. My favorite filter is still an old Datong FL-3! > > So that's my take on it. I know lots of folks are happy with DSP. I just think it makes everything sound like a cheap cell phone. > > 73, > > Lonnie > NY2LJ > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Jim Harris-4
Hi Lonnie and Rolf:
I'm not sure the question was really answered. I trust you both realize that the DSP as a whole, as well as individual features such as filters, noise reduction, and auto notch filter can be switched on and off from the front panel. So the answer to your question, Rolf is: Yes, it is possible. Hope that helps, 73 John, N6JW ____________________________ Rolf, oh6kxl, asked: >>How about switching KDSP2 DSP-filters off? Use DSP filters only >>when >>conditions are requiring it. Is it possible? Lonnie, NY2LJ answered: >I didn't think it was worth the trouble. I like having the KAF2 filters and >they're tight enough so that I can get around most hetrodynes. If conditions >were marginal, the de-noiser often made things worse, not better. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Jim Harris-4
Hello Jim,
I've owned my 746PRO for about 3 years, and my K2/100 S/N 3039 w/ all options for a little over 2 years, so I feel qualified to render an opinion here. I'll start by saying that although the 746PRO is a nice rig, it's no match for the K2 for CW, which is my primary mode of operation. For that reason, the K2 has been my primary rig ever since I built it, and I pretty much keep the 746PRO around for use as a reference for frequency accuracy, and as a monitor when testing things, such as mod's to the KSB2, or more recently, to monitor the output of the XV144 transverter. As for the K2, I had always been a fan of the KAF2, but, IMHO the versatility of the KDSP2 makes it a much more useful option. The NR performance of the KDSP2 is better than that of the 746PRO, plus it is more configurable. The DSP bandpass filtering of the KDSP2 is very good as well, and I use it at times, but my primary usage of the KDSP2 is for noise reduction, at which it excels. Although the high 'Q' of the KAF2's filter provides a very nice peaking effect, the KDSP2 filter, when adjusted for a 50Hz bandwidth, sounds very similar. Plus, you have the option of selecting a 'softer' filtering algorithm, which I particularly like with the narrower bandwidth settings. So, in my opinion, the KDSP2 offers far more performance and versatility, and is worth the extra money. 73, Dale WA8SRA Jim Harris wrote: >... My question today is how much difference is there in >performance between the KDSP2 and the KAF2? Is the >KDSP2 worth the extra $140? I'm been using an >IC-746pro for about a year and a half so I am familiar >with the use of a DSP. > > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:36:49 -0500, Dale Boresz wrote:
>So, in my opinion, the KDSP2 offers far more performance and >versatility, and is worth the extra money. I have the same experience as Dale, and the same rigs. My 746 (not a pro) is loaded with Inrad filters for CW and SSB. My K2/100 has the DSP module, and although I'm primarily a CW op, I used it on SSB in a couple of contests to see what it would do. My 746 is used almost exclusively on 6 and 2 meters (with outboard preamps), both CW and SSB. I LOVE the DSP in both radios. I use it both in narrowband audio filter mode and as noise reduction, and I am very happy with both. I have not used a K2 with a KAF2. Jim Brown K9YC _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Jim Harris-4
On Feb 6, 2005, at 6:57 PM, Jim Harris wrote: > Hopefully, I'm about two and a half weeks from > ordering a K2 with about four accessory kits. My > question today is how much difference is there in > performance between the KDSP2 and the KAF2? Is the > KDSP2 worth the extra $140? I'm been using an > IC-746pro for about a year and a half so I am familiar > with the use of a DSP. I've had both in my K2. Here are my impressions. I wasn't thrilled with the KAF2. The CW filters in the K2 are sharp enough that I never needed to "supplement" it with an audio filter. I also found that the narrow audio filter sounded a little bit too "ringy" for my tastes. I did, however, make use of the real-time clock in the KAF2 on occassion. Setting it was a pain, though. I also appreciated how much high-pitched audio hiss the standard low-pass filter of the KAF2 removed. It was worth the price just for this feature. THe KDSP2, on the other hand, has been a boon for me. For SSB, it is indispensable. I run the auto-notch all the time in SSB. I use the filtering to help clean up the shape of the crystal filter. It also helps to have a couple of narrower positions handy on SSB. On SSB and CW, I haven't found the NR filter to be terribly useful, although it sometimes helps. Biggest problem is that it makes it sound like you are listening to the band through a long narrow tube. I'd buy the KDSP2 again. The KAF2 would be OK if you are running battery or solar powered and are concerned with power consumption. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: [hidden email] Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |