Why not a KX4?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Why not a KX4?

Tony Estep
Actually the KX3 is pretty hard to improve, but the one obvious
consideration is that the internal batteries should be LiPo. Another
possibility would be a different way to generate the oscillator freq to
ensure super-stability; even after the refrigerator procedure mine drifts
-3 or -4 Hz in a WSPR interval, which is right at the ragged edge. I can't
think of any other changes but others may.

73,
Tony KT0NY
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Why not a KX4?

Steve Sergeant
My wish list for the KX3 would be to serve as K2 replacement,
price/performance wise. While I could list some UI and under-the-hood
improvements, and I agree with Tony's suggestion below, I want to make a
form-factor suggestion.

I'm imagining the KX3 repackaged so that it can be used alone as a QRP
rig, but can also be docked-into a larger chassis (K2-sized?) as its
front panel. That lager box could include integration of the guts of the
KXPA100, a bigger battery (like 6_Ah or so), a bigger speaker, a flip-up
or flip-out (on a side) display for an integral PX3 replacement. (Or
better from my perspective, a WiFi or Bluetooth interface sending
waterfall data to a phone or tablet app?)

Have it both ways: A high-end QRP rig, or a reasonably compact 100W
full-featured portable.

DE KC6ZKT --... ...--

PS: Tony, my KX2 seems more frequency stable than my KX3 on WSPR.


On 3/25/19 20:58 PM, Tony Estep wrote:
> Actually the KX3 is pretty hard to improve, but the one obvious
> consideration is that the internal batteries should be LiPo. Another
> possibility would be a different way to generate the oscillator freq to
> ensure super-stability; even after the refrigerator procedure mine drifts
> -3 or -4 Hz in a WSPR interval, which is right at the ragged edge. I can't
> think of any other changes but others may.
>
> 73,
> Tony KT0NY
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Why not a KX4?

Edward R Cole
In reply to this post by Tony Estep
The KX3 appeals to the portable operator better than the larger
K2.  Certainly some upgrades for it would be desirable.

But my KX3 replaced a FT-817.  Main use is for mobile coupled with
KXPA100 and  2m amplifier (I have the 2M module).  The other prime
use is as a 2m IF for my portable mw station where 1w is sufficient
on 2m to drive the 10 GHz transverter.

Glad to have IQ I/F for digital modes or spectrum sw run in a laptop.

Better freq stability on 6m & 2m would be nice.

BTW the KX3 has been used on 2m-eme for DXpeditions where small size
matters.  Its small enough to pack in my carry-on luggage.

73, Ed - KL7UW
------------------------------
From: Steve Sergeant <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Why not a KX4?
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

My wish list for the KX3 would be to serve as K2 replacement,


73, Ed - KL7UW
   http://www.kl7uw.com
Dubus-NA Business mail:
   [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Why not a KX4?

Tony Estep
In reply to this post by Steve Sergeant
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:20 PM Steve Sergeant <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> ...my KX2 seems more frequency stable than my KX3 on WSPR...

==================
Yep, becuz it has a different scheme for generating the osc freq (if I'm
not mistaken, synth vs VFO). So that's one of my wished-for improvements.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Why not a KX4?

Jim Brown-10
In reply to this post by Edward R Cole
On 3/26/2019 12:21 AM, Edward R Cole wrote:
> Better freq stability on 6m & 2m would be nice.

Thanks to extensive work by W7GJ, a production change was made several
years ago to improve stability with a redesign of the main board.
There's also a user temperature calibration routine that helps a lot.

73, Jim K9YC

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html