addendum to K2 problem

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

addendum to K2 problem

John Wiener
Hi again

Well this morning I checked all the coax connections  all snug   soldered connections to g5rv window line intact  
Re checked the K2/100 and KAT100
Here’s the results

no lights on SWR below 20M  again variable output and SWR

SO…it turns out I have a faulty cable from the shack to the outside box.  I switched to a diff line and all is well for now

Thanks for all the support over the years
Sorry for the false alarm.

73

John
AB8O
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: addendum to K2 problem

Guy Olinger K2AV
Having heard stories like this hundreds of times over the years, why do we
start by thinking the radio is broken?  :>))  Wish I had a buck for every
post here complaining about radio gear that wound up completely external to
K2, K3, KATxxx, etc. In some cases it was a really hard sell to get the guy
to go outside to find where the problem really was.

Is that because the radio is in front of us and has lights on, and
therefore is what our eyes fasten upon?  Or are we really that
pre-disaffected with our radios?

73, Guy K2AV

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:37 AM, John Wiener <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi again
>
> Well this morning I checked all the coax connections  all snug   soldered
> connections to g5rv window line intact
> Re checked the K2/100 and KAT100
> Here’s the results
>
> no lights on SWR below 20M  again variable output and SWR
>
> SO…it turns out I have a faulty cable from the shack to the outside box.
> I switched to a diff line and all is well for now
>
> Thanks for all the support over the years
> Sorry for the false alarm.
>
> 73
>
> John
> AB8O
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: addendum to K2 problem

k6dgw
On 12/4/2014 11:12 AM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:

> Is that because the radio is in front of us and has lights on, and
> therefore is what our eyes fasten upon?  Or are we really that
> pre-disaffected with our radios?

Probably neither.  It seems to be basic human nature to assume the
worst.  Kid is overdue from a school event, "OMG, Kevin's been kidnapped!"

73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 50th Running of the Cal QSO Party 3-4 Oct 2015
- www.cqp.org

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: addendum to K2 problem

Jim Allen
In reply to this post by Guy Olinger K2AV
I estimate that something over 90% of all the problems I have had with rigs
over the years not performing up to spec came from from bad coax and
connector installation.  That's the first thing I suspect now.  Goofy tune
up, weird SWR readings, lo-no output, poor signal reception, hair loss and
gout, all from bad connectors and bad coax!

It's not always that, of course, but it has been the first place to start
looking, and testing every part of the feed line from S0-239 to driven
element!

73 de W6OGC  Jim Allen

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Having heard stories like this hundreds of times over the years, why do we
> start by thinking the radio is broken?  :>))  Wish I had a buck for every
> post here complaining about radio gear that wound up completely external to
> K2, K3, KATxxx, etc. In some cases it was a really hard sell to get the guy
> to go outside to find where the problem really was.
>
> Is that because the radio is in front of us and has lights on, and
> therefore is what our eyes fasten upon?  Or are we really that
> pre-disaffected with our radios?
>
> 73, Guy K2AV
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:37 AM, John Wiener <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi again
> >
> > Well this morning I checked all the coax connections  all snug   soldered
> > connections to g5rv window line intact
> > Re checked the K2/100 and KAT100
> > Here’s the results
> >
> > no lights on SWR below 20M  again variable output and SWR
> >
> > SO…it turns out I have a faulty cable from the shack to the outside box.
> > I switched to a diff line and all is well for now
> >
> > Thanks for all the support over the years
> > Sorry for the false alarm.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > John
> > AB8O
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:[hidden email]
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > Message delivered to [hidden email]
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: addendum to K2 problem

Don Wilhelm-4
That is why I first ask how the transceiver behaves when connected to a
dummy load.
Even that is not conclusive because there is always the possibility of a
faulty coax between the transceiver and the dummy load, but it does
usually rule out a fault in the transceiver and force attention to the
antenna system.

Bad connections in the antenna system can cause all kinds of 'strange
happenings'.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 12/4/2014 5:22 PM, Jim Allen wrote:

> I estimate that something over 90% of all the problems I have had with rigs
> over the years not performing up to spec came from from bad coax and
> connector installation.  That's the first thing I suspect now.  Goofy tune
> up, weird SWR readings, lo-no output, poor signal reception, hair loss and
> gout, all from bad connectors and bad coax!
>
> It's not always that, of course, but it has been the first place to start
> looking, and testing every part of the feed line from S0-239 to driven
> element!
>
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]