I was wondering what is the easiest way to bypass the ATU in the K2 so that
it can be used with an external AMP? 73, Bill Allen - WA5PB _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Bill,
Try tuning the ATU in a 50 ohm load. GL, Sjoerd PE2SVN -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] Namens Bill Allen Verzonden: woensdag 30 augustus 2006 14:16 Aan: [hidden email] Onderwerp: [Elecraft] how to bypass atu? I was wondering what is the easiest way to bypass the ATU in the K2 so that it can be used with an external AMP? 73, Bill Allen - WA5PB _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Bill Allen-6
Bill,
Set the menu to ATU CALP or ATU CALS to bypass the LC section of the KAT2. Similarly with the KAT100, set it to ATU CAL. 73, Don W3FPR > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Bill Allen > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 8:16 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [Elecraft] how to bypass atu? > > > I was wondering what is the easiest way to bypass the ATU in the > K2 so that > it can be used with an external AMP? > > > > 73, > > Bill Allen - WA5PB > > > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/430 - Release Date: 8/28/2006 > > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Bill Allen-6
As usual Don has provided the correct direct answer to your question.
However, I'm wondering if it would not be desirable to keep the tuner in the path to the amplifier. I believe it will assure a measure of additional filtering for spur suppression and match the amplifier input exactly. Just a thought. I don't think there is a down side to keeping the tuner in the circuit. Bill AK5X _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |