matching cw filters

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

matching cw filters

Scott Dunlavey
going to order some cw filters ... what I would like to do is this...
(with a sub rx!) get  400 Hz X 2...  and 200 Hz x 2... my question is,
would it be better to wait on the 200 Hz if I cant get both 200 Hz at
the same time or can I get one at a time... get the other later on...


scott
w2ntv
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: matching cw filters

Charles Tropp
Hi Scott!

If I understand your question correctly, you have a K3 with the KRX3
sub-receiver installed and now you want to add CW filters for both but
are not sure as to whether you should order and/or install matching
filters in both. Firstly, the only reason to purchase matching filters
at the same time is to insure diversity receive coverage such as low
signal work on 160 meters with specialized antennas. If that is not your
goal, then it really does not matter. Secondly, matching offsets on CW
filters only applies to the five pole filters. (200Hz & 500Hz). If you
are purchasing the 8 pole filters (250Hz & 400 Hz), there is a 0 offset
so there is nothing to match. Thirdly, you do not have to have the same
filters in the Main and Sub-Receivers. For example you could have narrow
filters in the Main to allow copying of the DX station and moderate
filters in the Sub to listen for the pileup.

I hope this answers your questions.

73, Charles, N2SO


On 7/24/2012 10:44 PM, Scott Dunlavey wrote:

> going to order some cw filters ... what I would like to do is this...
> (with a sub rx!) get  400 Hz X 2...  and 200 Hz x 2... my question is,
> would it be better to wait on the 200 Hz if I cant get both 200 Hz at
> the same time or can I get one at a time... get the other later on...
>
>
> scott
> w2ntv
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>

--
Test Charles R Tropp
Staten Island NY 10314
USA
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: matching cw filters

Joe Subich, W4TV-4
Scott,

If you need narrow filters in both receivers, I would wait on the
200 Hz filters until you can get both at the same time and specify
"filter matching."  Given the variability of crystals, the filter
offsets tend to vary from batch and it is sometimes difficult to
match an arbitrary offset across batches.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 7/24/2012 10:44 PM, Scott Dunlavey wrote:
> going to order some cw filters ... what I would like to do is this...
> (with a sub rx!) get  400 Hz X 2...  and 200 Hz x 2... my question is,
> would it be better to wait on the 200 Hz if I cant get both 200 Hz at
> the same time or can I get one at a time... get the other later on...
>
>
> scott
> w2ntv


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html