Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 post
|
Hello all Elecrafters,
microHam sells two different cables for the K3 to use with the microKeyer/microKeyerII one that uses a front microphone jack and the other that uses the rear microphone jack. Aside from the obvious, one doesn't clutter the front panel with a cable all the time, is there any other advantages to one over the other? Also anyone out there that has the original microKeyer and upgraded to the microKeyer II please explain what the advantages are with using it on the K3. Thanks and 73, David, N4IN ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2826 posts
|
> microHam sells two different cables for the K3 to use with the > microKeyer/microKeyerII one that uses a front microphone jack > and the other that uses the rear microphone jack. Aside from > the obvious, one doesn't clutter the front panel with a cable > all the time, is there any other advantages to one over the > other? The only difference is that the rear mic version does not support the up/down controls or the +8V line that are available on the front mic jack. If you were to try to use a "Foster" style mic that required power or had up/down buttons they would not work with the rear mic cable (when the buttons are supported). > Also anyone out there that has the original microKeyer and > upgraded to the microKeyer II please explain what the > advantages are with using it on the K3. The "advantages" are in the additional features of microKEYER II - specifically the USB sound card, dual channel receive for KRX3 support, Icom transceive output for use with Icom accessories (e.g., band switching with a PW-1), native control of a SteppIR antenna, or an auxiliary serial port for rotor control. 73, ... Joe Subich, W4TV microHAM America http://www.microHAM-USA.com http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM [hidden email] > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of David Shelton > Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 9:54 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [Elecraft] new K3 owner sn 497,need help with > choosing microkeyer cable > > > Hello all Elecrafters, > microHam sells two different cables for the K3 to use with the > microKeyer/microKeyerII one that uses a front microphone jack > and the > other that uses the rear microphone jack. Aside from the > obvious, one > doesn't clutter the front panel with a cable all the time, is there > any other advantages to one over the other? Also anyone out > there that > has the original microKeyer and upgraded to the microKeyer II please > explain what the advantages are with using it on the K3. > Thanks and 73, > David, N4IN ... [show rest of quote] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |