Do I understand correctly that, while memories can store both VFO A and VFO B, they have to 1) be on the same band when storing VFOs into memory, 2) when recalling, VFO B must already be on the band that is in the memory ? I have CONFIG:VFO IND=YES and no KRX3 installed, if that matters. Thanks Pf -- Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
The only reason I would not set CONFIG:VFO IND=YES is that I would be concerned about transmitting on another band without knowing it when I was using split. If you had the KRX3, then you might be spared from transmitting on another band without knowing it when using split. 73, Amateur Radio Operator N5GE On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:27:26 +0200, Pierfrancesco Caci <[hidden email]> wrote: > >Do I understand correctly that, while memories can store both VFO A and >VFO B, they have to >1) be on the same band when storing VFOs into memory, >2) when recalling, VFO B must already be on the band that is in the > memory ? > >I have CONFIG:VFO IND=YES and no KRX3 installed, if that matters. > >Thanks > >Pf ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
|
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:04:42 -0500
[hidden email] wrote: > > The only reason I would not set CONFIG:VFO IND=YES is that I would be > concerned about transmitting on another band without knowing it when > I was using split. > > If you had the KRX3, then you might be spared from transmitting on > another band without knowing it when using split. Hi, thanks for the input. I'm not actually concerned about split (although you have a good point there), rather about the usefulness of having a memory that can store both vfo A and B, but you can't recall B if it's not already on the same band. And yes, I really need to put that antenna back up and get to actually use the new radio I have, instead of playing with memories and remote control <g> Pf -- Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx <[hidden email]> ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by N5GE
> > > The only reason I would not set CONFIG:VFO IND=YES is that I would be > concerned > about transmitting on another band without knowing it when I was using > split. You cannot enter split if the vfos are on different bands. > > > > > >Do I understand correctly that, while memories can store both VFO A > and > >VFO B, they have to > >1) be on the same band when storing VFOs into memory, > >2) when recalling, VFO B must already be on the band that is in the > > memory ? > > Both of these are true. 73, Fred KE7X ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:12:54 -0600
"Cady, Fred" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > >Do I understand correctly that, while memories can store both VFO A > > and > > >VFO B, they have to > > >1) be on the same band when storing VFOs into memory, > > >2) when recalling, VFO B must already be on the band that is in the > > > memory ? > > > > > Both of these are true. > Thanks. So the only way to recall a memory that contains band limits for scan purposes, and be sure you get what you want, is: M->V, select the memory of interest, M->V, A->B, M->V, M->V. Correct? Pf -- Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx <[hidden email]> ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Cady, Fred
You're right Fred! Thanks for correcting me. Then, other than monitoring two bands what is the purpose of having the VFO's independent? On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:12:54 -0600, "Cady, Fred" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > >> >> >> The only reason I would not set CONFIG:VFO IND=YES is that I would be >> concerned >> about transmitting on another band without knowing it when I was using >> split. > >You cannot enter split if the vfos are on different bands. > >> >> >> > >> >Do I understand correctly that, while memories can store both VFO A >> and >> >VFO B, they have to >> >1) be on the same band when storing VFOs into memory, >> >2) when recalling, VFO B must already be on the band that is in the >> > memory ? >> > > >Both of these are true. > >73, >Fred KE7X ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |