sub receiver

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

sub receiver

Alan Grant
I am a very happy owner of a K3 (whole system) but I did not order the sub
receiver, what am I missing out on

VK4KO

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: sub receiver

wayne burdick
Administrator
Hi Alan,

The sub receiver has a few primary uses:

- Monitoring one frequency (even on a different band) while operating on another. You might be waiting for a sked or a band opening, or waiting for a chance to call one station while tuning around looking for others. Very useful for hunt 'n' pounce operation, field day, etc.

- Listening to a DX station with one receiver while listening to a pileup calling him in the other. This allows you to search for a clear spot to call (or find the place where he's listening, by listening to other callers) without missing any of the DX station's transmissions. This works in either SPLIT or non-SPLIT mode. Without the sub receiver, this would typically be done by using SPLIT and the REV switch to periodically search for a transmit frequency. But with the sub, you can park VFO B on the DX station and use VFO A for transmit -- i.e., no need to use SPLIT.

- Diversity receive, where main and sub are locked together on the same frequency but they use two different antennas. If the sub's antenna is polarized somewhat differently from the main receiver's antenna, stations subject to fading (QSB) will tend to become louder in one receiver even when fading in the other. This is especially valued by low-band DXers, who have to play every trick in the book to copy weak stations.

The sub can have a different band, mode, and filter settings from main.

73,
Wayne
N6KR


On Oct 30, 2013, at 8:23 PM, "Alan Grant" <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I am a very happy owner of a K3 (whole system) but I did not order the sub
> receiver, what am I missing out on
>
> VK4KO


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: sub receiver

Scott Manthe-2
In reply to this post by Alan Grant
Your question assumes that we know how you operate and what you want out
of your station. There is no way we can know this. Think about how you
operate and what you could do with a second receiver and then decide if
you need or want one.

If you don't know why you might need or want a sub receiver, you
probably don't need one.

73,
Scott, N9AA


On 10/30/13 11:23 PM, Alan Grant wrote:
> I am a very happy owner of a K3 (whole system) but I did not order the sub
> receiver, what am I missing out on
>
> VK4KO
>
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: sub receiver

Rick WA6NHC
In reply to this post by Alan Grant
Wayne, as usual, gave a concise answer.  

If you DX, it's a great tool to add BUT: you want to consider a P3 if you
don't already have one.  It's difficult to say which is better if you have a
limited budget and depends on if you're audible or visual oriented.

A sub-receiver for planning your DX 'attack' is very valuable.  With the P3,
you can SEE the pattern the DX station is using (moving up the split or
what?).  You essentially can hear two frequencies at the same time (to know
when to call the DX) plus see what you're not hearing.

If you don't DX, the added 'tools' may have little value.  If you use the JT
modes, a TCXO may be a valuable option.  If you simply ragchew, having the
P3 means you can nag your friends about their poor audio (it isn't too hard
to tell the KIY brands on the air, they don't have steep walls and tend to
be overdriven).

When you budget the second receiver, if you EVER plan on using diversity
reception, the filters should be the same in both receivers.  That adds a
bit more expense.

And since you have to take a few things out to install the second receiver
including the front panel (to be put back in of course), you might consider
what other options could be added at the same time.  It's only money ;o)

Best of luck,
Rick wa6nhc


-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Grant

I am a very happy owner of a K3 (whole system) but I did not order the sub
receiver, what am I missing out on

VK4KO

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: sub receiver

Jim Brown-10
On 10/30/2013 11:17 PM, Rick Bates wrote:
> If you DX, it's a great tool to add BUT: you want to consider a P3 if you
> don't already have one.

Strongly agree. I've got P3s for both rigs in my SO2R setup, and take
them to FD and CQP expeditions, and both rigs in my SO2R setup have the
SubRX. The second RX is VERY nice to have, for the reasons Wayne noted,
but if dollars were limited, I'd lean strongly to the P3 as the FIRST
way to spend them. Why? Because the P3 gives you a view of empty bands
(6M, 10M), of pileups, and of RFI sources. All those applications for
the 2nd RX that Wayne noted are also quite useful if you need them.

The P3 tells you more about the pileup than the SubRx and how might
interact with it, and it does the empty band and RFI thing, but it
doesn't do diversity.  I have Beverages, and I find them useful from 160
to at least as high as 20M. You can assign them to the main RX which can
help with weak signals, but you need the 2nd RX to do diversity, which
can help even more. Diversity is most useful on 40-160.

73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: sub receiver

Fred Smith-2
In reply to this post by Alan Grant
There have been many very good answers the main reason I switched to the
K3's from the Yaesu FTDX-5000MP's a bit better main receiver on  the Yaesu
at that. The reason the second receiver same as the first with the same
amount of filters if wanted. Not second rated ones like all the others top
of the line radios costing up to $14-15,000 and can't keep up with the K3's
second receiver. With it you know you're getting the same signal with it as
the main not so in the TS-990 or the first, Yaesu's 9000's or Icom's 7800.

It's a huge asset to the radio and along with a P3 a must for DX'ing once
you have a good one your pretty well hooked for life


73,
Fred/N0AZZ
K3 Ser # 6730--KX3 # 5210--K2/100 # 6470-KAT100
P3/SVGA--KAT500--W2
Amps Elecraft KPA500 HF/6m--Alpha 9500 HF--Mirage B-5030-G 300+w--(2)
B-5016-G's 165w 2m




-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Alan Grant
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 10:23 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [Elecraft] sub receiver

I am a very happy owner of a K3 (whole system) but I did not order the sub
receiver, what am I missing out on

VK4KO

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3426 / Virus Database: 3222/6796 - Release Date: 10/31/13

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: sub receiver

Keith Heimbold
In reply to this post by Alan Grant
I have a K3 with a second receiver that I use rarely but I enjoy having it for DX pileups that work split. It has saved me buckets of time getting through the pileups. I also plan to use it this winter for receive antennas for the lower bands. However since I am into 6m I find having a visual tool of the band invaluable. I could probably live without the second receiver but I don't think I could live without the ability to see the band and short openings that are occurring on 6m.

Keith
AK6ZZ

Sent from my iPhone please excuse typos

> On Oct 30, 2013, at 8:23 PM, "Alan Grant" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I am a very happy owner of a K3 (whole system) but I did not order the sub
> receiver, what am I missing out on
>
> VK4KO
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Wattmeter Calibration

Roger D Johnson
I finally figured out what was happening. The procedure in the manual is wrong!

On step 5, the power is set by the FRONT PANEL POWER CONTROL

On step 7, TAP tune, do NOT hold it. If you hold it, you get the tune power which
is a separate menu item.

To key the tx in CW I had to insert a shorted plug in the key jack on the rear
panel.

The WMTR LP menu item is evidently controlled by the circuitry that switches the
100 watt PA in and out. If the power control is set above a certain level, the menu
item switches to WMTR HP.

73, Roger





--
Remember the Liberty (AGTR-5)
http://www.usslibertyveterans.org/
http://www.gtr5.com/

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Wattmeter Calibration

Geoffrey Downs-3
In my view the manual is not wrong in that respect. It tells you to set the
TUN PWR menu item to NOR before you start.

However, I have always found a different problem. The last step of the
procedure tells you to hold TUNE and adjust the menu parameter (WMTR: LP or
HP) for exactly 5w or 50w. But holding TUNE takes you out of the menu. So I
adjust the menu parameter when the K3 is not txing and then hold TUNE again
to see what the effect has been, repeating the process as necessary to
achieve 5w or 50w. Anyone else see this? Or have I been doing it wrong these
last 5 (nearly 6) years (quite possible hi).

73 to all

Geoff
G3UCK

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger D Johnson
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 3:05 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [Elecraft] Wattmeter Calibration

I finally figured out what was happening. The procedure in the manual is
wrong!

On step 5, the power is set by the FRONT PANEL POWER CONTROL

On step 7, TAP tune, do NOT hold it. If you hold it, you get the tune power
which
is a separate menu item.

To key the tx in CW I had to insert a shorted plug in the key jack on the
rear
panel.

The WMTR LP menu item is evidently controlled by the circuitry that switches
the
100 watt PA in and out. If the power control is set above a certain level,
the menu
item switches to WMTR HP.

73, Roger





--
Remember the Liberty (AGTR-5)
http://www.usslibertyveterans.org/
http://www.gtr5.com/

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html