RE: Z match versus KAT100
Posted by
Don Wilhelm-3 on
Jun 01, 2005; 1:31pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/Z-match-versus-KAT100-tp378948p378950.html
David,
There is a good chance that you are not imagining things. Your tuner is
likely a link coupled design which isolates the transceiver side from any
circulating currents on the antenna side. A balun does not provide the same
isolation. Antenna currents can be induced from BC stations, wind static,
rain static, etc. as well as the desired signals.
73,
Don W3FPR
> -----Original Message-----
>
> I'd appreciate thoughts about what I *think* I hear! I normally
> use K2/100,
> KAT100, BL1 (4:1 balun), open wire feeder and 84' dipole - works fine. 80m
> is noisy but I get a good match on all bands. I recently
> connected a Z-match
> tuner (old KW Easi Match - like the Johnson Matchbox) to the output of the
> KPA100 (bypassing the tuner and balun) and fed the same open wire
> feeder and
> antenna. The contrast between QSOs and the noise on 80 increased
> (copy much
> easier). S meter peaks the same and match is as good.
>
> Am I imagining this, or is there a reason? Thanks.
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.4.0 - Release Date: 6/1/2005
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
[hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htmElecraft web page:
http://www.elecraft.com