Login  Register

Re: Collins and Mechanical Filters (was at one time about up-conversion)

Posted by Jack Smith-6 on Aug 13, 2006; 9:27pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/Up-conversion-tp392867p392894.html

At the risk of drifting the thread even further away from filtering, you
might find the recently declassified issue of the Cryptologic Quarterly
issue devoted to analyzing the Gulf of Tonkin incidents of 2-4 Aug 1964
of interest. It can be found at
http://www.nsa.gov/vietnam/releases/relea00012.pdf and has extensive
discussion of how intercepts were used to piece together what happened.

If you go to the main Vietnam page http://www.nsa.gov/vietnam/ and
follow the links (particularly the Release 1 and Release 2 message
links) you can see a lot of the declassified source documents.


Jack



Fred Jensen wrote:

> How these threads do morph!  I don't know about RCA MF's, but I can
> attest to the extreme non-fragility of the Collins variety (and in
> fact "everything Collins").
>
> In the mid-60's, while in the USAF (1Lt), I commanded an airborne team
> whose missions were to put mobile, hardened TACANS on various mountain
> tops in undisclosed locations for 10-15 days.  After getting down, we
> got our equipment out of the C-130 using LAPES (Low Altitude Parachute
> Extraction System).  The gear was mounted on shock pallets, the A/C
> made a low pass and, with a tail-hook apparatus, snagged a shock cable
> we had erected on flimsy poles, and flew out from under the pallets.  
> Snap opening cargo chutes "landed the pallets," as the system
> description quaintly said.  Despite all the shock protection, "landed"
> was really stretching the term, even for the guvmint.
>
> The pallets always contained two KWM-2A's packed in aluminum
> foam-lined cases which we used to communicate with our FOHQ south of
> the 17th who coordinated the CH-3's to come pick us up when we'd run
> out of JP4 for the generators.  The tubes were packed separately, but
> other than that, the 2A's were stock, ready to transmit.  We did 24 of
> these missions and I lost four troops, but we lost zero out of 48
> -2A's.  Collins also manufactured our A/G radios (can't remember their
> nomenclature at the moment), and we never lost one of those either.
>
> Unfortunately, our missions ended by lighting off thermite on the pile
> of equipment ... burning up 48 perfectly serviceable, beautiful
> KWM-2A's was really really hard for a ham, and I wondered if my ham
> colleagues would ever forgive me.
>
> I used an S3-line for years, and while I don't have it any more to do
> an A/B test, based on my memory (a bit leaky these days), I think the
> K2 IF filters will easily stand up to the mech filters ... and, unlike
> the MF's, I can tailor the K2 filters as I wish.
>
> I think someone suggested that the move from AM to SSB was driven by
> the superior filtering that became available at the same time (please
> forgive me if I got that wrong).  Personally, I think it was VOX.
>
> Re R390A's:  The Wullenweber array and station at Clark AB in the
> Philippines, operated by the ATDE ("Agency That Doesn't Exist"), used
> 390A's.  I wasn't permitted to know for what.
>
> Fred K6DGW
> Auburn CA CM98lw
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: [hidden email]
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com