Posted by
N2EY on
Jun 01, 2007; 7:55pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/Solid-State-Amps-tp448434p448439.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Buller <
[hidden email]>
>I see there is now a
>great interest in solid state amps.
>I thought that these amps were...well...not as efficient as tube amps
thus not
>being attractive to hams.
>So, what has
>changed? Have the SS Amps gotten more efficient?
In the case of truly *linear* amplifiers (not Class E or Class D), I
don't think the SS amps have gotten much more efficient than they were
years ago.
What *has* changed is this:
First, the cost of a tube amp keeps increasing because the tubes
themselves and the parts around them are low-quantity items. You can
still build a tube amp for cheap *if* you don't insist on 100% new
parts. Rig manufacturers have to use all-new parts, though. Meanwhile,
the cost of SS keeps going down. I also think the dollars-per-watt cost
of RF transistors has gone down and the watts-per-device has gone up
over the years.
Second, under the old rules of way back when, we hams measured power by
DC input, so efficiency was a big deal, since at the legal limit,
higher efficiency meant more watts to the antenna. But since the rules
changed 20-odd years ago to output, DC-to-RF efficiency takes a back
seat.
The difference between a legal-limit amp that's 66% efficient (2250
watts input gives 1500 watts output) and one that's 50% efficient (3000
watts input gives 1500 watts output) is 750 watts at the DC input. That
seems like a lot, but consider that with SS there are no heaters to
keep warm 100% of the time and that the 750 watts difference is only
needed when actually transmitting.
Third, switching power supplies.
Fourth, things like no fans, no tuning and easy remote/computer control
have become more important to a lot of hams, as well as less expensive
in the overall picture. Consider a K3, KPA1500 combo - won't *that* be
a sweet setup? Yet in inflation-adjusted dollars, it will probably cost
less than an S-line of 40 years ago.
Fifth, in the old days it was common for contesters to have separate
amps for each band so they didn't have to lose time retuning. With an
SS no-tune amp, computer-controlled and integrated into the rig, one
amp can be just about as flexible as the old stack of them.
IOW, it's evolutionary, not revolutionary.
And the evolution has been going on a long time. I still remember, as
a relatively-new ham, when a QST arrived that showed a legal-limit
all-HF-bands all-solid-state linear amplifier on the cover. Full
homebrewing details, too - you could build one from the article.
Back then I thought "well, we won't see tubes in ham shacks for much
longer, because now even the high-power folks don't need tubes in their
rigs."
That QST issue was for April 1976...
73 de Jim, N2EY
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
from AOL at AOL.com.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
[hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htmElecraft web page:
http://www.elecraft.com