Posted by
David Woolley (E.L) on
Jul 09, 2007; 7:59am
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/YAQ-Yet-Another-K3-Question-tp449289p449299.html
Bill Coleman wrote:
> What you'd end up with for the "receiver" would be a Mixer and clean
> DDS, followed by a high-speed, wide-range A/D converter. Everything else
I don't understand why you write about such things as in the future.
There are several products on the amateur market, although I don't know
if any of them use a DDS VFO.
> The interesting part of this approach is that we can re-define what we
> mean by a receiver. The detection portion of the radio need not resolve
> to the width of an audio channel. Consider a receiver that can decode
> every CW signal in a 50 kHz portion of the band. Simultaneously. How
> useful would that be?
The telcos where doing direct digital conversion from analogue carrier
systems to multiple PCM channels a long time ago. I think before your
1995 article.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
[hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htmElecraft web page:
http://www.elecraft.com