Posted by
Greg - AB7R on
Jun 19, 2007; 3:09pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/YAQ-Yet-Another-K3-Question-tp449289p449303.html
Exactly the case. With the built-in decoder you can take the K3 someplace portable
without a computer and still send and receive PSK31/RTTY just as easily as having a
QSO in CW.
-------------------------
73,
Greg - AB7R
Whidbey Island WA
NA-065
On Tue Jun 19 4:08 , "Julian G4ILO" sent:
>On 6/18/07, Toby Deinhardt
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> It has always struck me as a bit silly to go from analog to digital back
>> to analog only to return to digital, which is what you would be doing
>> with the K3 and a sound card based solution.
>
>I think the number of conversions is the same, it's just a matter of
>whether the conversion is done in the computer or the radio. Since a
>computer has a more powerful processor, I would expect it to do a
>better job, if available. The value of the built-in encoder/decoder is
>to allow operation using popular data modes *without* a computer.
>
>--
>Julian, G4ILO
>G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
>K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n: ???
>_______________________________________________
>Elecraft mailing list
>Post to:
[hidden email]
>You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
>Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm>Elecraft web page:
http://www.elecraft.com_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
[hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htmElecraft web page:
http://www.elecraft.com