Re: K3 2.7 k Filter vs. 2.8 k
Posted by
Bill W4ZV on
Sep 19, 2007; 12:56am
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/K3-2-7-k-Filter-vs-2-8-k-tp453183p453185.html
On 9/18/07, Larry Phipps <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> The variable CW filter might also be a good choice once
> it's available, depending on IMD performance. Eric indicated that Wayne
> likes the variable filter approach, and it would be a flexible one...
> but I want to see performance numbers.
The variable filter sounds great but I would insist on seeing numbers
first. Introducing additional components like varactors may have some
unexpected effects on IMD results. As they say in Missouri..."Show
Me"
73, Bill W4ZV.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
[hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htmElecraft web page:
http://www.elecraft.com