Re: Sherwood on ARRL Testing Methodology (LONG!)

Posted by Julian, G4ILO on Oct 01, 2007; 9:12am
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/Sherwood-on-ARRL-Testing-Methodology-LONG-tp453987p453989.html

That is exactly right. And it is not a fault only of ARRL. You never
read a harsh review in RSGB RadCom or Practical Wireless over here
either. PW reviews are a total waste of time as they are completely
subjective.

--
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: ???
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Ham-Directory: www.ham-directory.com


On 10/1/07, Mike Fatchett W0MU <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > When will the day come when the information in QST is more than a
> > fluff review, and a free multi-page advertisement for the manufacturer?
>
> When the magazine publishing costs are not paid for by the advertisers?
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com