http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/Sherwood-on-ARRL-Testing-Methodology-LONG-tp453987p453992.html
When I spoke with Peter a year or so back about a possible K2 review he didn't
seem very interested. Who knows, the K3 may evoke a different response.
> RSGB, unlike ARRL, does not buy products for review. Review products
> are loaned free of charge by dealers or manufacturers (this practise
> in common with all UK magazines I am aware of - and I worked for
> several years as an editor and then freelance reviewer for computer
> publications.)
>
> I think the only reviews of Elecraft products that have appeared to
> date have been written by people known to the RSGB committee who
> bought them for their own use. (I wrote and submitted a review of the
> T1 ATU a few years ago but despite a favourable initial reaction from
> the then editor it was never published.)
>
> If Elecraft wants a RadCom review of a K3 someone needs to arrange for
> Peter Hart to receive the loan of one.
>
> --
> Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n: ???
> G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
> Ham-Directory: www.ham-directory.com
>
>
> On 10/1/07, Stewart Baker <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>> It will be interesting to see if the K3 gets a full spec review in RadCom.
>> Probably not as there is no advertising money from Disti's involved.
>>
>> 73
>> Stewart G3RXQ
>>
>> On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:12:50 +0100, Julian G4ILO wrote:
>>> That is exactly right. And it is not a fault only of ARRL. You never
>>> read a harsh review in RSGB RadCom or Practical Wireless over here
>>> either. PW reviews are a total waste of time as they are completely
>>> subjective.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to:
[hidden email]
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft>
> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm> Elecraft web page:
http://www.elecraft.comSubscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):