http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/K3-QRQ-high-speed-QSK-tp5057956p5059579.html
> Honestly, that is the first time I have heard that. Obviously did not
> see the memo. Back to "OLD QSK". Hurray.
>
> Need to spend time doing more random word searches in the manual.
>
> 73, Guy.
>
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:16 AM, John, KD8K<
[hidden email]> wrote:
>> I am not sure if this has been mentioned yet, but another setting that
>> may have an affect on this is switching between "New" QSK and "OLD" QSK
>> by tapping 3 under the CW WGHT Menu Item. I think that the default is
>> "New". I believe "Old" is supposed to provide better QSK performance
>> while "New" reduces keying artifacts.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> John
>>
>> Toby Pennington wrote:
>>> A friend of mine and I experiminted to see if the K3 could hear a bk during a transmission at high speeds
>>>
>>> He was using the K3 with a pre BETA version, and I was on a Icom 7700. He would send a macro at a high speed, and I would try to break him using two letters (ie). Almost always he could hear my first break attempt. We went up to 75 wpm and he could still hear my bk.
>>>
>>> So, we are wondering about what is going on concerning this thread. Now, it is possible my friend is hearing between words, but the bk could be heard almost 100%.
>>>
>>> My friend says the delay should be set to double zero on the K3 for it to work????
>>>
>>> Toby W4CAK