Login  Register

Re: [K3] Modification day for SN 01195

Posted by Joe Subich, W4TV-4 on Aug 26, 2010; 3:24pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/K3-Modification-day-for-SN-01195-tp5463862p5466019.html


Bill,

 > I use low pitch settings of 300-440 Hz and have considered both mods
 > but haven't yet decided it's worthwhile.  Without having two units
 > (one with and one without) to compare, it's tough to know whether I'd
 > notice any difference.

I added the LPF to my Rev.B DSP board and found that worthwhile.  I
can certainly notice the decrease in high frequency "garbage" in both
speaker (Sony "bookshelf" speakers) and headphone (200/120 Ohm) audio.

The only receive effect of the DSP upgrade is to decrease the LF corner
frequency when using headphones.  The corner (-3 dB point) frequency is
dependent on the headphone impedance.  Here is a comparison of the
original 10 uF coupling capacitors and the new DSP board with 100 uF caps:

  Z       Original   Modified   Notes
---------------------------------------
600       26 Hz       3 Hz
400       39 Hz       4 Hz
200       80 Hz       8 Hz     Heil ProSet
150      101 Hz      10 Hz     Senheiser PC-350
120      124 Hz      12 Hz     Yamaha CM-500
  64      221 Hz      22 Hz     Senheiser HD-280 Pro
  32      398 Hz      40 Hz     Direct Sound EX-29
  24      497 Hz     50 Hz     Sony MDR-V150
  16      663 Hz      66 Hz     Etymotic ER6i, HF5
   8      995 Hz      99 Hz     Yaesu YH-55

The obvious conclusion is that the new DSP board reduces the corner
frequency by a factor of 10 (as expected).  Whether it matters to a
given user depends on his headphone preference and the importance of
LF response.  With your EX-29, you might find the DSP replacement a
plus; with my CM-500, I decided to pass on the DSP board replacement.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV

On 8/25/2010 10:17 PM, Bill W4ZV wrote:

>
>
> Nick-WA5BDU wrote:
>>
>> K3DSPLPF --- Active audio LPF to reduce artifacts in the audio chain,
>> add daughter board to DSP board
>>
>> <SNIP>
>>
>> I was most interested in the lowpass filter.  I'm no golden ear, but
>> possibly the power of suggestion made me think I heard some of the
>> harshness others described.  I found myself cranking the bandpass way
>> down toward the low end.  At least preliminarily, I think I do notice
>> the improvement in the quality of the sound (I work CW) with the LPF
>> installed.
>>
>
> http://www.elecraft.com/order_form_parts.htm
>
> K3DSPUPGD   Improves low freq RX/TX audio response below 300 Hz, and adds
> a Low Pass Filter (LPF) that rolls off RX audio above 4 kHz.
>
> K3DSPLPF   Small LPF add on SMD board for earlier K3 DSP boards that adds
> a Low Pass Filter to roll off RX audio above 4 kHz. This is already included
> on the K3DSPUPGD (above)
>
> I believe it's the DSP mod which improves audio response at the low end.
> The DSPLPF rolls off audio artifacts above 4 kHz.
>
> I use low pitch settings of 300-440 Hz and have considered both mods but
> haven't yet decided it's worthwhile.  Without having two units (one with and
> one without) to compare, it's tough to know whether I'd notice any
> difference.
>
> 73,  Bill
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html