Are you sure that the problem isn't your REF CAL settings are off from where you think they are?
> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:02:43 -0800
> From:
[hidden email]
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 APF
>
>
>
> KK7P wrote:
> >
> >
> >> The APF algorithm is unchanged. Lyle is going to verify.
> >
> > They are identical.
> >
>
> Maybe not quite identical. The new algorithm is zero beat and the initial
> one peaked at +10 Hz above zero beat. It could be that guys were not tuning
> to the actual peak so the residual ringing could have been several dB
> stronger than the signal (relatively) making one think there was more
> ringing. Now the zero beat signal may appear stronger than the residual
> ringing (on noise) since it is better centered. BTW the filter response
> measures about -4 dB at a 10 Hz offset, which is quite noticeable on weak
> signals.
>
> I personally don't notice any difference but I had been peaking each signal
> using VFO-FINE in 1 Hz steps (which is how I found the +10 Hz offset in the
> initial version).
>
> 73, Bill
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-APF-tp5735159p5736422.html> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html