Posted by
Vic K2VCO on
Dec 02, 2010; 12:55am
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/Fwd-New-Sherwood-report-tp5793377p5794292.html
ARRL does include an oscillograph of a 60 wpm dit as well as a graph of the composite
noise spectrum of the transmitted CW signal. But the average ham doesn't look carefully at
this, or understand it.
In my opinion, they should develop a standard way of specifying the bandwidth consumed by
a keyed CW signal, expressed as a single number. Then you could compare transmitters and
something problematic like the FT-1000 would stand out.
On 12/1/2010 3:37 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
>
>
> A good start would be for someone ... hello ARRL? ... to document key
> clicks. A lot of good it does for me to have a rig with excellent 2 KHz
> BDR only to have everything ruined by key clicks from some Yaesu rig
> that neither the manufacturer nor the operator will fix.
>
> Dave AB7E
>
>
>
> On 12/1/2010 3:48 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>>
>> Given the recent discussion on the FT-5000's transmitted phase noise, it
>> would be nice to see if Bob could provide some independent testing of
>> transmitters as well.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html--
Vic
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html