Login  Register

Re: TCXO - 0.5PPM

Posted by radioshoppe on Dec 29, 2010; 1:19am
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/TCXO-0-5PPM-tp5872529p5873443.html

Hi,

Thank you Wayne, for your fast response.  Seems I'm better off to stick with my stock TCXO as I've never had much luck with method 1 and 2.  My K3 was in the shop 3-4 months ago and looks like Rene set it's frequency dead on.

Happy New Year. 73

Jim, W0EM


--- On Tue, 12/28/10, Wayne Burdick <[hidden email]> wrote:

> From: Wayne Burdick <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] TCXO - 0.5PPM
> To: "Jim Harris" <[hidden email]>
> Cc: "Elecraft Email" <[hidden email]>
> Date: Tuesday, December 28, 2010, 6:24 PM
> At present, "method 3" remains
> unimplemented. Fortunately the TCXO's uncorrected drift is
> already less than +/- 0.5 PPM from 0 to 50 C. This was the
> target for "method 3".
>
> 73,
> Wayne
> N6KR
>
> On Dec 28, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Jim Harris wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Been kicking around putting the 0.5PPM TCXO in my
> K3.  After doing some reading a question or two
> arises.  The instructions sheet(s) for the TCXO
> mentions using method 1,2 or 3 in the K3 manual to set
> frequency.  The K3 manual does not have a method 3 as I
> can find.  I've checked the reflector archive and found
> there is a data input feature in the K3 utility for
> inputting data received with the TCXO.  I think this
> equals method 3.  Someone make a note to change
> instructions/manuals if needed.
> >
> > My question is do I need to do a method 1 or 2 before
> doing the data input?  Method 1 is to use a freq
> counter.  My freq counter is only about +/- 10 Htz
> depending on variables.  Method 2 is zero beat. 
> By ear the best I can get is about +/- 25 Htz.  How
> close do I need to get with method 1 or 2 (if needed) before
> inputting the data?
> >
> > Second question, will the 0.5PPM TCXO eliminate the
> hysteresis I see during RTTY?  Depending on whether I
> tune to a signal from low to high or high to low I can see
> 10+ Htz difference in the signals frequency.  Or, are
> other factors at work?
> >
> > Constructive thoughts appreciated.
> >
> > Happy New Year.  73
> >
> > Jim, W0EM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:[hidden email]
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>


     
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html