Posted by
wayne burdick on
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/And-Or-Options-tp6442350p6445547.html
The KXAT3 will have the same matching range as the KAT3. The only
difference is the power-handling capability, and the use of latching
relays so RX-mode current drain is zero when not actually tuning the L-
network.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
On Jun 6, 2011, at 7:57 AM, John Ragle wrote:
> This is exactly correct! A "bad" (i.e. incapable) ATU is useless, and
> for mobile, at least, external power is not a problem. Even using the
> radio as a BPS (backpacker's special) it is much less problematic to
> carry a small external battery pack than an external ATU. You can use
> the battery pack to keep your electric socks warm while waiting for
> sunspots...
>
> John Ragle -- W1ZI
>
> On 6/6/2011 10:31 AM, David Yarnes wrote: [snip]
>> ...If a VHF option is possible, but would require some
>> substitution, is it
>> possible to have it be an alternative to the internal battery
>> option instead
>> of the ATU? Maybe I'm in the minority, but to me, the internal ATU
>> is much
>> more valuable than the battery option. External power is much less
>> problematic than a good ATU...
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html