Login  Register

Re: KX3 vs. K3 and other rigs?

Posted by Alan Bloom on Jun 07, 2011; 6:17pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/KX3-vs-K3-and-other-rigs-tp6443819p6450810.html

Interesting analysis Dave.  Assuming everything is logarithmic, a 33%
increase in contacts for a 13 db power increase implies 7% more contacts
for 3 dB more power:

10^[(3/13) * log(1.33)] = 1.07

And 100% more contacts for a 25 dB power increase implies 8.7% per 3 dB:

10^[(3/25) * log (2)] = 1.087

However, I think that overstates the advantage of higher power.  The
higher-power stations also probably had better antennas and other
equipment as well.  But it does put a useful upper bound on the number.

In a non-competitive situation I would expect the difference to be even
less.

Alan N1AL



On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 12:20 -0500, dave wrote:

> To try to put some meaningful numbers on the value of a few extra dB I
> looked at some recent contest scores. Actually not at the scores
> themselves but the number of Q's made. There is of course wide
> variability in this. A lot appears to depend on whether it is
> primarily a NA contest or international. But it might give some clue
> about the value of additional power.
>
> To hopefully remove some of the many variables, I looked only at the
> top few stations. The assumption is that these guys have good stations
> with good antennas in good locations. Have to believe that they put in
> nearly equal effort, i.e. approx the same number of hours. Implicit
> also is the assumption they are approx equally good operators.
>
> In the 2010 ARRL 160m contest these power levels made this many Q's:
>
>        1st   2nd
> QRP   805   718
> LP   1078  1038
> HP   1989  1776
>
> In 2010, with the low sunspot numbers, this was basically a NA
> contest. Not much in the way of DX activity.
>
> Assuming other things are equal - which may or may not be the case -
> it looks like 13 dB (5w to 100w) is worth about a 33% increase in Q's.
> And 25 dB (5w to 1500w) will yield somewhat more than double.
>
> In the 2010 ARRL Sweepstakes:
>
>        1st    2nd
> QRP   982    835
> LP   1257   1244
> HP   1466   1453
>
> This is a NA contest.
>
> Here 13 dB was again about a 33% increase and 25 dB something less
> than double. Indeed having a KW was not much help here.
>
> But if we look at longer distance and check the 2010 ARRL
> International DX contest (looking at stations in NA, not EU or other
> continents):
>
>          1st    2nd
> QRP    1021    912
> LP     2872   2738
> HP     4362   4474
>
> Here 13 dB gives nearly 3x as many contacts. 25 dB gives about 4.5x as
> many.
>
> It looks like a few extra dB may be valuable on longer paths, but not
> worth much within NA, which is about what you would expect.
>
> This does not address the question of what 3 dB is worth. A little
> hard to figure. Within NA 13 dB yields about 33%. So what would 3 dB
> yield? Dunno, but my guess is not much.
>
> How much is 3 dB worth on longer paths? Again hard to say but there is
> probably some threshold, or minimum required, to work the DX. Is that
> threshold 3 dB, i.e. 10w? Honestly probably not. Somewhere between 5w
> and 100w, but unknown.
>
> Maybe some enterprising souls could get together, a few run 5w, a few
> run 10w, a few 25w, and a few 50w. Compare results when it is over.
>
>
> 73 de dave
> ab9ca/4
>
>
>
>
>
> On 6/7/11 7:23 AM, drewko wrote:
> > There is another way of looking at it-- how many additional contacts
> > would potentially be available by utilizing an increase of just 3db?
> >
> > I don't know the answer but there is a somewhat analogous situation in
> > astronomy having to do with the brightness of stars. They are also
> > measured on a logarithmic scale, called magnitude, each magnitude
> > representing twice or half the brightness level of the following or
> > preceding magnitude. A difference of one magnitude does not appear
> > very large to the eye, yet the ability to see one magnitude fainter
> > can yield three times as many stars. I imagine some similar effect
> > might pertain to radio waves.
> >
> > BTW, I'm not asking for more power in the KX3; would be quite content
> > with 10 watts, same as my K3.
> >
> > 73,
> > Drew
> > AF2Z
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:56:48 -0700, Alan N1AL wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 08:10 -0700, juergen wrote:
> >>
> >>> However from a communications effectiveness point of  20 watts is a
> >>> much more realistic power level, especially for SSB QSO's.
> >>
> >> The difference between 10 and 20 watts is only 3 dB, half an S-unit.
> >> Compared to the 20-30 dB of QSB you often find on the HF bands, you
> >> would hardly even notice such a small difference.  I think it is quite
> >> rare that 3 dB would be the difference between making a contact or not.
> >>
> >> Alan N1AL
> >>
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:[hidden email]
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html