Re: KX3 vs FT817 - how do the "inside dimensions" compare?

Posted by Jim Low man on Oct 23, 2011; 4:58pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/KX3-vs-FT817-how-do-the-inside-dimensions-compare-tp6919846p6922376.html

After almost 50 years of being a ham, I see that the conventional wisdom
of NOT including general coverage in a receiver has been refuted.  It was
thought to be at the expense of performance on the ham bands.

How have modern design techniques overcome this limitation?

73 de Jim - AD6CW

On 10/22/2011 10:11 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote:

> Hi TR,
>
> The KX1 is our smallest radio, with TFR (trail-friendly) format and an
> attached paddle, like the KX3. It also uses a DDS VFO and SSB/AM
> receive, providing SWL coverage in addition to the ham bands.
>
> 73,
> Wayne
> N6KR
>
>
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html