Posted by
rlindzen on
Dec 08, 2011; 9:54pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/KAT500-update-tp7072932p7076047.html
Actually, it seems to me that an antenna tuner is needed because SWR
is high, and if SWR is high, there are extra losses in the
feedline. The lowest cost low loss feeder is open line, and a
balanced input to the tuner would be useful.
Dick, WO1I
At 10:48 PM 12/8/2011, Arie Kleingeld PA3A wrote:
>Thanks,
>
>This is exactly what I need! There is only unbalanced coax in my shack.
>
>73
>
>Arie PA3A
>
>
>
>Op 8-12-2011 2:22, Wayne Burdick :
> > We originally had two antenna jacks on the KAT500, with one of them
> > switchable between balanced and unbalanced.
> >
> > Recently we decided that a third antenna jack would provide greater
> > utility overall. (In my case, I'll be keeping a dummy load on the
> > third jack.) All three jacks will be unbalanced (SO239).
> >
> >
>______________________________________________________________
>Elecraft mailing list
>Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft>Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>
>This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net>Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html===============================
Richard S. Lindzen
Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric
Sciences
Office: 54-1720, MIT
Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
1 (617) 253-2432 (voice)
Home: 301 Lake Avenue
Newton, MA 02461-1211 USA
1 (617) 332-4342 (voice)
Paris:
103 Avenue de la Republique
75011 Paris FRANCE
33 (0)1 43 14 93 79
Skype: 617-564-1942
===============================
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html