http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/New-K3-built-can-I-reset-the-5w-calibration-tp7076112p7080368.html
Mike. but 5% of full scale for a 100 watt slug is 5 watts. That is
exactly the point being made. The error is a percentage of the Full
scale reading, and not a percentage of the actual reading.
significantly lower than the power ratting of the slug .
> 5% of 50 watts is not 5 watts.
>
> 73, Mike
>
> On 12/9/2011 10:32 AM, Eugene Balinski wrote:
>>> From what I understand, the meter is rated at 5% of the
>> **full scale** rating according to Bird. Full scale
>> rating, is the rating on the slug.
>>
>> That would mean that for a meter with a 100W slug, your
>> accuracy is +/- 5W (5%). So, if your wattmeter is reading
>> 50W, the actual RF power could actually be 45 or 55 W....
>>
>> 73
>> K1NR
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 09:08:55 -0500
>> Mike<
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Wait.
>>>
>>> Using a 100W slug, if you get a reading of 100 watts, the
>>> real power would be between
>>> 95 and 105 watts, right?
>>> If you get a reading of 50 watts the real power would
>>> fall in a range of less than 45
>>> to 55 watts?
>>>
>>> Not if the 5% at full scale is the best accuracy. Or did
>>> I misunderstand what you said?
>>>
>>> 73, Mike NF4L
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/8/2011 11:59 PM, Eugene Balinski wrote:
>>>> The accuracy of Bird elements is typically +/- 5% of
>>> the
>>>> full scale value. For a 100 W Slug, that is +/- 5
>>> Watts.
>>>> So theoretically speaking, with 5W in, and 0
>>> registered
>>>> on the meter, the meter is still within its rated
>>> accuracy.
>>>> Additionally on the model 43 meter, there is meter
>>> scale
>>>> end compression. To get the most accurate reading, one
>>>> would want to have the 5W reading at the middle of the
>>>> meter range, which means that one would want a 10W
>>> slug.
>>>> Unfortunately I do not believe that Bird makes a 10W
>>> HF
>>>> slug any more. Perhaps they need an Elecraft W2 ??
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>> K1NR
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:47:27 -0600
>>>> Nate Bargmann<
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>> From my experience, trying to measure 5W with a 100W
>>>>> element leads to
>>>>> very inaccurate readings. The Bird is most accurate
>>> when
>>>>> the reading is
>>>>> as near to full scale as possible. That means a 5W HF
>>>>> element (is that
>>>>> even available?) would be ideal provided no more than
>>> 5W
>>>>> is put through
>>>>> the meter. A 10W element would be less accurate but
>>>>> provide a safety
>>>>> margin for the meter. Even better would be to have
>>> both
>>>>> elements and
>>>>> use the 10W one to get in the ballpark and the 5W one
>>> for
>>>>> a final check.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, de Nate N0NB>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of
>>> all
>>>>> possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true."
>>>>>
>>>>> Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more:
http://www.n0nb.us>>>>>
>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft>>> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>>> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>>>
>>> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net>>> Please help support this email list:
>>>
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Web mail provided by NuNet, Inc. The Premier National provider.
>>
http://www.nni.com/>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html>