it. There is a lot of function (particularly for ECOMM) that is useful.
software or anything) do not have a proper place in ham radio. I guess
> Leaving aside the proprietary codec, much of the specification has been implemented as open source software; for those that don't like the codec, there is work progressing on a replacement, which I am following closely. For what it's worth, this is the second time today I've had this debate, and hopefully I'm making sense about it.
>
> Matthew Pitts
> N8OHU
>
>
>
>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Sandy<
[hidden email]>
>> To:
[hidden email]; Greg Troxel<
[hidden email]>
>> Cc:
[hidden email]
>> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 10:13 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] D-Star
>>
>> Amen, amen! Ditto for the Proprietery PACTOR III !!!! Or anything else
>> "Proprietary" PERIOD!
>>
>> This isn't what ham radio is all about! Can't agree with you more Don!
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Sandy W5TVW
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Don Wilhelm
>> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 8:42 PM
>> To: Greg Troxel
>> Cc:
[hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] D-Star
>>
>> I agree fully, despite the article in the May issue of QST which glosses
>> over the proprietary nature of D-Star.
>>
>> I am opposed to the use of proprietary protocols in ham radio. Ham
>> radio to me is free radio. I have passed my license requirements, and
>> should be able to use whatever modulation techniques are authorized by
>> the FCC. The thought of paying for a license (even though that payment
>> may be bundled with a transceiver purchase) is foreign to my views of
>> ham radio.
>>
>> Certainly, I buy computers with Windows loaded, but I do not buy Icom
>> transceivers with D-Star loaded. That is what is foreign to my view of
>> ham radio.
>>
>> Until someone comes up with an open source and free to use substitute
>> for the AMBE Codec that is owned by Digital Voice Systems, Inc., I will
>> not be using D-Star.
>>
>> 73,
>> Don W3FPR
>>
>> On 4/28/2012 9:17 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>>> I would hope that Elecraft would not add D-Star support; I think it's
>>> against the spirit of amateur radio, and particularly contrary to the
>>> kit culture, to have an on-air specification that an individual amateur
>>> is precluded from implementing without obtaining a patent license.
>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft>> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net>> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4965 - Release Date: 04/28/12
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft>> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net>> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html>>
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html>