Login  Register

Re: question for psk users

Posted by GP Morin on May 02, 2012; 2:24pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/Re-question-for-psk-users-tp7517322p7522912.html

Agree w/"Oh brother". Guess the panadapter should go also (for those other modes)...


Gpm

(sent from iPod Touch - please excuse typos)

On May 2, 2012, at 5:23, "John E. Reiser" <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Oh brother!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "briana" <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 7:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] question for psk users
>
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> This rational is bogus.  The PSK users have to get used to decoding one
>> signal at a time with narrow filters if that's what is necessary. To
>> expect to have 2 or 3 KHz free of strong signals is crazy.
>>
>> Dealing with this reality puts the burden on the receiving end.  No way
>> can you control what the rest of the wold does.  This isn't the Magic
>> Kingdom.
>>
>> Given that PSK is a narrow bandwidth mode, why not use that to your
>> advantage?
>>
>> Other modes deal with strong adjacent signals, why not PSK?
>>
>> You bought a K3 for its high dynamic range and high adjacent signal
>> handling capability.  Why not use it for this purpose?
>>
>> Of course the argument ignores all the laws of physics and
>> propagation.    I suggest you run some VOACAP prediction calculations
>> with 25 watts and look at what you can't work with 25-75 watts.   You
>> may not be interested in working the other side of the world, but others
>> are.
>>
>> PSK isn't magic.
>>
>> 73 de Brian/K3KO
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/1/2012 11:46 PM, Jon Perelstein wrote:
>>> Eric KG6MZS asked why wouldn't you run more than 70w on PSK
>>>
>>> Because with the close spacing of signals in the various PSK  sub-bands,
>>> a
>>> signal of more than about 50watts will completely annihilate all the
>>> other
>>> PSK signals and make that sub-band unusable for everyone else.  The rule
>>> of
>>> thumb for being polite on PSK is to operate 25-30w max.  I won't claim
>>> that
>>> there aren't some who are operating more (you Cuban stations know who you
>>> are), but many/most of us will avoid QSOs with people who are obviously
>>> running 50w+
>>>
>>> 73s
>>> Jon, WB2RYV
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2411/4972 - Release Date: 05/01/12
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html