http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/Re-Another-End-of-an-Era-tp7559254p7559414.html
That battle is lost already. Plasma TVs, switching wall warts,
see any issue. Your neighbor who just spent $3000 or more on his new
>Dear Dave,
>
>And the downside is that if all the national broadcasts and
>religious broadcasts desert the HF spectrum, then there will be no
>risk when regulators let radio noise sources proliferate unchecked.
>For example, there have been a few articles about a new technology
>for charging cell phones remotely by using radio wave in the 40
>meter range. These will be little radio jammer devices, no matter
>how the manufacturers may deny it. And the remaining users of he HF
>spectrum, us hams, will just be out of luck.
>
>Oliver Johns
>W6ODJ
>
>
>On Jul 18, 2012, at 2:03 PM, David Christ wrote:
>
>> For the SWL fan who is interested in the challenge of being able to
>> receive the station in is a downer.
>>
>> Of course the upside is how much more is available for the people who
>> are only interested in hearing the content. For $140 you can buy an
>> Internet radio that can be set to an estimated 18,000 different
>> stations.
>>
>> Upside for amateurs is that it reduces the pressure on spectrum.
>>
>> David K0LUM
>>
>> At 1:18 PM -0700 7/18/12, Phil Kane wrote:
>>> On 7/17/2012 5:42 PM, David Moes wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As have many other HF broadcasters, who have found out that it is
>>> cheaper to set the programs up on an Internet server than to pump many
>>> KW of RF into the air.
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft>> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net>> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html>>