Login  Register

Re: [K2] Tuning a magloop with KAT100

Posted by Rick WA6NHC-2 on Nov 30, 2015; 7:35pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/K2-Tuning-a-magloop-with-KAT100-tp7610957p7610961.html

Brian,

Magloops have a VERY narrow bandwidth and putting RF power into them can
cause significant damage if the ANTENNA is not tuned.  Plus you'd be
experiencing significant line loss on your feed if the SWR wasn't
right.  That's two major drawbacks of your plan.

I would suggest that bypassing the KAT100 and tuning only with the
controls for the magloop is a far better way to go.  A mistuned magloop
will also show substantial  LOSS at the desired frequency so all tuning
should happen at the antenna for best operations.  First peak the
receiver noise as you adjust the antenna controls, then apply only
enough power to get a response from the SWR meter (say 5-10 watts); fine
tune the antenna controls for a good match.  Do NOT use the tuner in the
radio.

I was given one, have tried it and frankly I'm unimpressed with the
operation and performance.  I was hoping for better as it would make a
nice RV antenna, but a dipole works MUCH better.  If it is all one can
manage (HOA or lot limitations), it works but it is so narrow that
typical S&P ops are rather challenging, you're never tuned for that new
frequency.  As one that changes bands often and quickly, it would
severely hamper how I operate.  Tuning requires patience and time on the
lower bands, even a 20 KHz frequency change requires retuning.

But the bottom line is that in this case you must tune the ANTENNA, not
match it externally.  Good luck!

73,
Rick wa6nhc

On 11/30/2015 11:20 AM, Brian - N5BCN via Elecraft wrote:

> I've recently acquired a magloop that will be used with a K2/KPA100/KAT100
> and I wanted to double check my tuning procedure.
>
> My plan was to tune the KAT100 into a dummy load (ATU in AUTO mode) and then
> place the ATU into SWR (x.x-1) mode.  Then use the TUNE button on the K2 to
> tune the loop to resonance, then operate.  Repeat for any band changes or
> when encountering significant SWR.
>
> Does this sound reasonable or am I missing a step or two?
>
> Brian, N5BCN
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]