Login  Register

Re: OT - operating QRP at same park

Posted by Richard Thorne-4 on Apr 16, 2017; 7:18pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/OT-operating-QRP-at-same-park-tp7629369p7629377.html

May have been the same issue if the radios were on opposite frequencies.

The station on 20 was, more than likely,  getting hit with 40m
harmonics.  I have high power band pass filters (4O3A products) and I
can still here my 40m signal on the exact harmonic on 20m.  For example
if I'm transmitting on 7.025 I'm going to hear the harmonic around 14.050.

Rich - N5ZC

On 4/16/2017 1:58 PM, Kevin - K4VD wrote:

> I understand we are speaking about the KX2 here but I'm curious... would
> roofing filters have helped in this situation?
>
> In a recent WWFF outing we had a KX3 and an FT-817 set up. We separated the
> antennas best we could but really didn't pay a lot of attention to it. I
> believe the KX3 was on 40 and the 817 on 20 meters. The KX3 never heard the
> 817 but the 817 (no roofing filters I think) washed out when the KX3 was
> keyed.
>
> The radios were about 30 feet apart and the antennas maybe 40-50 feet apart.
>
> If the KX3's success was due to the roofing filters installed, could some
> sort of external filter added to the KX2 contribute to a solution? Is the
> KX3 meant to play well with others while the KX2 is intended more for a
> solo trip? I understand W4RT has optional roofing filters for the FT-817. I
> wonder if he or someone might come out with a good option for the KX2.
>
> Then again... am I way off base here?
>
> 73,
> Kev K4VD
>
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Fred Jensen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> At 30-40 ft separation on 15 and 20, your two antennas are probably within
>> each other's near-field and each is thus "part" of the other.  The coupling
>> in the near-field can be very high.  The general rules are:
>>
>> 1.  Separate the antennas by as much as possible, preferably several
>> wavelengths.  A wavelength on 20 meters is ... well, ~20 meters [roughly 67
>> international feet].
>>
>> 2.  Orient/position the antennas such that one is in the other's null.
>> For half-wave dipoles, that's off the end and FD experience suggests
>> colinear with each other and well separated works best. Note however, if
>> they are within each other's near-field, orientation may have little if any
>> effect [see #1 above].
>>
>> During the BPL bruhaha a number of years ago, I modeled my my non-resonant
>> sloping-V and a couple of 12 KV distribution lines [which would have been
>> the BPL carrier] together using NEC-2, similar to K9YC's suggestion, to see
>> how badly I would disturb my neighbor's BPL I'net if he had it.  The
>> coupling coefficient on 40 meters and higher was pretty stable at around
>> -30 to -35 dB.  On 80 and 160, where the power line and antenna shared a
>> near-field, the coupling was in the -10 to -15 dB range.
>>
>> As you describe them, and with perhaps 10 watts for easy math, the
>> received power might be one or two tenths of a watt.  It's not real
>> surprising the receivers "cried out in pain" [:-).
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Fred ("Skip") K6DGW
>> Sparks NV USA
>> Washoe County DM09dn
>>
>> On 4/16/2017 9:44 AM, kevino z wrote:
>>
>>> A friend and I both had our KX2 transceivers and some resonant end fed
>>> antennas. He was on 15m and I was on 20m. Our antennas were placed about
>>> 30-40 feet apart, as slopers with the radiating ends up 30+ feet in the air
>>> using Jack-kite poles. The plane of the antenna's slope were perpendicular
>>> to each other.
>>> We were both on 10w SSB.
>>>
>>> Every time one of us keyed up, the other person's KX2 would experience a
>>> nasty noise from the signal. Pre-amp was off, as was attenuator. My
>>> question is this: Would the use of some bandpass filters have helped us?
>>> This is a situation we are trying to resolve before operating QRP in a
>>> similar park for a QSO party.
>>>
>>> If more distance between the antennas would have helped, what is the
>>> proper way to determine the needed separation?
>>>
>>> I read the other day about someone in a car using 3 or 4 Elecraft radios
>>> with antennas on the roof, so I imagine there has to be a way.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Kevin (KK4YEL)
>>>
>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [hidden email]
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]