Posted by
Joe Subich, W4TV-4 on
May 26, 2018; 6:42pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/Does-KPA1500-have-these-KPA500-characteristics-tp7641171p7641243.html
On 2018-05-26 2:11 PM, Joseph Reed wrote:
> I agree it is a weak signal mode.
...
> Unfortunately the advent of FT-8 has introduced a large number of
> individuals not brought up in the tradition of using low power to
> communicate on a weak signal mode.
*WHEN* will people get it through their heads that WEAK SIGNAL is
not the same as low power? The original "weak signal" mode is EME
yet almost 100% of EME work is done with high power - 1500 W on
CW and often 1000 W (or more) even with JT65 - plus extremely high
gain antennas (well in excess of the largest "stacked arrays" on HF).
*THERE IS NO "TRADITION" OF LOW POWER FOR WEAK SIGNAL MODES*
Conflating weak signal and low power is an artifact of PSK31/63/125
HF operation where lids run a 2 - 3 KHz wide passband or SDR rigs with
no RF/IF filters and then complain when strong, adjacent signals
overdrive their (cheap) sound cards or drive the IF/mixer/ADC of their
cheaply designed transceiver into distortion or overflow.
Use the same techniques that have been used for decades with *WEAK*
*SIGNAL* modes - narrow IF filters, strong preamplifiers, IF chains
with high compression levels, mixers with high IMD thresholds, etc.
- and there is no conflict between high transmit power and weak
signal modes.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.htmlMessage delivered to
[hidden email]