http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/KPA-1500-Efficiency-As-A-Function-of-Input-Power-tp7644445p7644459.html
I have a KPA500, not a '1500 but I run mine full tilt on RTTY.
syllables. RTTY is a "continuous" mode without the syllabic breather, but it's
still intermittent.
> So why do most RTTY users run their amps at reduced power?
>
> John KK9A
>
>
> From: Charlie K3ICH
> Date: Fri Aug 17 09:24:18 EDT 2018
>
>
> I really do NOT understand why this data is so surprising.
> It all seems to me to be perfectly normal with the amplifier's highest
> efficiency occurring at near max output.
> Which curiously, I would assume, is the way the amp was designed.
>
> Think zero output with zero drive = zero efficiency.
> Apply some drive, read some output and the efficiency goes up from there.
>
> 73, Charlie k3ICH
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net <elecraft-bounces at
> mailman.qth.net> On
> Behalf Of john at kk9a.com
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 8:57 AM
> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Cc: charles at k5ua.com
> Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 Efficiency As A Function of Input Power
>
> Interesting data, Charles. I assumed that running the KPA1500 (or KPA500)
> at lower power would keep the fan from running as much. I knew that
> efficiency changed with output power but I did not expect that it was this
> significant. If your data is correct there is 1000++ watts of heat to
> dissipate no matter what power level you use.
>
> John KK9A
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html> Message delivered to
[hidden email]
>