http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/Re-Less-Than-Perfect-Antennas-tp7646930p7646946.html
While in Ecuador I tried this skeleton discone. Did not work well.
to get a low <3 swr at design freq, 40 meters. I did not try adding more
Dr. Don W4BWS
> I wonder if anyone has ever tried, for want of a better name, a "Skeleton
> Cone" which consists of a single horizontal wire connected to the coax
> center conductor and two sloping wires at 45 degrees, in the same plane
> connected to the coax shield. A true Discone antenna would have many
> (typically eight each) horizontal and sloping elements. I'm guessing many
> of us have used the VHF/UHF version for very wide band coverage, for
> example 144, 220, 432 MHz and even higher. I know I have one up and it
> performs as well as a regular single band ¼λ ground plane (unity gain)
> on all three bands with low SWR. The ICOM version as well as a few others,
> also have a loaded whip for 52 MHz mounted on the bushing that the
> horizontal elements are screwed into.
>
> I'm also guessing the formulas for a true Discone would work for a
> "skeleton" style as well. I Since it is inherently a wide band design, the
> actual lengths are probably not too critical. I've heard this type antenna
> described, but I don't remember where or how well it supposedly worked. It
> obviously requires two supports, high enough that the sloping wires ends
> are off the ground by a bit.
>
> 73, Charlie k3ICH
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html> Message delivered to
[hidden email]