Posted by
Don Wilhelm on
Feb 07, 2020; 4:00pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/QRO-KPA500-Failure-tp7658244p7658276.html
John,
You are correct. I am seeing a lot of confusion and erroneous
conclusions based on the terms 'efficiency', 'dissipation' coupled with
'power output'.
As an example, consider that a PA running at 50% efficient at 500 watts
will dissipate 500 watts of heat and 500 watts of power out. Input DC
power will be 1000 watts.
Now back the power down to 250 watts - yes, the efficiency will be less,
say 33%. That is 250 watts of power output, but 67% of the total power
into the amp would be lost as heat - 417 watts of heat. Input power is
less too at 667 watts.
That drop in efficiency at lower than max design power is true for any
amp designed for their maximum rated power output (as most are).
The only ones who should be concerned are those who are monitoring their
draw from the AC line and their resulting utility bill.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 2/7/2020 10:16 AM,
[hidden email] wrote:
> There may be reasons for running at less than the amplifier max such as
> the US 200 watt 30m band limitation. I have no RF engineering knowledge
> but after looking at your data I see less heat with lower output wattage
> which seems to me like it would be less stress on finals.
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.htmlMessage delivered to
[hidden email]