Posted by
Edward A. Dauer on
Apr 25, 2020; 2:48pm
URL: http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/K4-S-meter-characteristics-tp7660056p7660154.html
Who uses S-values anyway? Maybe for serious propagation measurements, but I haven't heard anything but "5NN" or "59" in a contest as far back as I can remember, and likewise in CW DX work. It's programmed into the logging software and probably impossible to dislodge. I was recently in a DX pileup and decided to send a real report, 459, so the DX knew how he was actually doing in my part of the world. I could almost feel the annoyance coming back at me through the ether from both the fox and the other hounds. On CW and SSB rag chews I have heard real reports being exchanged, about both the signal and -- more commonly on SSB -- in complaints about the noise. But even there what matters is readability above the noise, not the microvolts themselves. IMHO, it's interesting to have S numbers on the scale of my P3, but if they disappeared from the K3 display it would be a long time before I noticed their absence.
"59 Good Buddy" (whatever that means),
Ted, KN1CBR
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 19:43:35 -0400
From: Brian Denley <
[hidden email]>
To: Charlie T <
[hidden email]>
Cc:
[hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K4 S-meter characteristics
Message-ID: <
[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
The International Amateur Radio Union (IARU) Region 1 agreed on a technical recommendation for S Meter calibration for HF and VHF/UHF transceivers in 1981.
Why go back to 1947?
Brian Denley
KB1VBF
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 24, 2020, at 6:30 PM, Charlie T <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> ?S-meters should be calibrated with 9 signal levels:
>
> *Faint - Signal barely perceptible
> *Very weak signals
> *Weak signals
> *Fair signals
> *Fairly good signals
> *Good signals
> *Moderately strong signals
> *Strong signals
> *Extremely strong signals
>
> (Reprinted from the 1947 ARRL Handbook, page 466 "RST System of Signal Reports")
>
> 73, Charlie k3ICH
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
[hidden email] <
[hidden email]> On Behalf Of John Stengrevics
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 7:49 AM
> To: Morgan Bailey <
[hidden email]>
> Cc:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K4 S-meter characteristics
>
> Agree completely. I find all S meters to be totally inaccurate and next to useless, including my K3S?.
>
********************
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.htmlMessage delivered to
[hidden email]