http://elecraft.85.s1.nabble.com/K3-Tx-Spurious-on-Specific-Frequencies-on-160-80-40-tp7667119p7667162.html
bolts etc. in particular those that bond boards to mounts (thermal
worth a peek.
radio strives to make the power level as set), amplified through each stage.
comments and testing.
(though one is 'better').
Good luck, please report back any useful comments or fixes.
> Thanks Rick. To answer those questions.
>
>
>
> I'm measuring this with the radio into a power attenuator and then with
> additional attenuation into a Perseus SDR operating as a spectrum analyser -
> well below its overload threshold and with plenty good enough phase noise
> and dynamic range to see this. I've also confirmed the signals are there on
> the second K3.
>
>
>
> I ripped out all the normal station cabling as part of the testing - so -
> yes everything is tight.
>
>
>
> I suspect I haven't noticed this before for two reasons. Firstly - the level
> of the spurii are very variable by specific frequency in the band - so you
> have to be a bit unlucky - and unless you're listening for it yourself on
> site - most times it would be too weak for people to comment / skimmers to
> pick it up. Also - the times I have run this radio with a second receive in
> band while transmitting it's normally been with the run radio above 7025
> where the spurii are at a much lower / no existent level.
>
>
>
> Secondly - I wonder if something is degrading in that radio. The fact that
> the spurious level changes significantly with drive levels suggests this is
> being generated by a non-linearity in the PA chain, and I wonder if I'm
> short of gain somewhere in the driver strip so the ALC is forcing the low
> levels in the strip to be driven harder.
>
>
>
> It is present on both radios, but is 15dB worse on one radio than the other.
>
>
>
> Andy, G4PIQ
>
> -------------------------
>
> NK7O wrote :-
>
> I don't have an answer, I have no test gear that would even allow a look
>
> (other than another radio). But I'm curious how you're measuring and
>
> observing (not doubting) these results.
>
>
>
> Except for the reports seen on the air to validate your observations; if
>
> the radio change barely affects the results and the condition does not,
>
> it's either a failure of both radios or the testing environment (i.e.
>
> transmitting into the same antenna).
>
>
>
> What happens with changes in power output, different (dummy) loads?
>
> Then the eternal question; since this hasn't been noted before at your
>
> station; what else is different or has changed? Have you tightened your
>
> antenna connectors lately?
>
>
>
> HNY,
>
> Rick NK7I
>
>
>
> On 1/1/2021 9:30 AM, g4piq--- via Elecraft wrote
>
>
>
> In general I've found the spurious performance of the K3 to be pretty good,
> but I've noticed something today that I thought it would be worth asking
> more widely if anyone else has seen and fixed.
>
>
>
> I was calling CQ on 40m around 7014 kHz and I noted that several skimmers
> also reported me weakly on c. 600 Hz either side of this frequency.
> Sometimes skimmers have bad spurious responses, but seeing this on more than
> one skimmer caused me to look more closely at my transmit spectrum. I
> discovered that - particularly on 40m - there were specific frequency ranges
> where a pair of sidebands appeared that move at 150% of the change in
> carrier frequency. So on 7012 kHz they are at roughly +/- 500 Hz, at 7011
> kHz they are at roughly +/- 1 kHz, at 7010 kHz they are at roughly +/- 1.5
> kHz. They cross over with the carrier just below 7013 kHz.
>
>
>
> Similar patterns recur in other parts of 40m, but they are strongest near
> the bottom of the band. There are dramatic step changes in the level of the
> spuria at the boundaries between synthesiser segments - So I see spurii from
> 7000-7004, none from 7004-7009, spurii 7009 -7015, etc. They peak in
> strength when they are about +/- 500 Hz from the carrier, but drop
> significantly in level as you get further from the carrier.
>
>
>
> The level of these spurii is what was concerning - at their worst they were
> less than 30dB down on the transmit signal. They grow somewhat non-linearly
> with power. At 5W they are -40dBc, at 12W they are -32dBc, at 13W they are
> -35dBc and at 100W they are a little less than -30dBc. I can see the same
> style of spuria in some segments on 80m and 160m - but at lower levels.
>
>
>
> I assumed this was a fault with that specific radio - and in some ways it is
> - but the same spurii are present on both K3s that I have here - but on the
> second radio they are no worse than -45dBc.
>
>
>
> I've disconnected everything connected externally from the radio, tried
> different power supplies, and recalibrated the synthesiser and Tx gain with
> no significant change.
>
>
>
> Both radios have the original synthesisers - not the KSYN3A.
>
>
>
> Any leads from anyone on this one?
>
>
>
> 73,
>
>
>
> Andy, G4PIQ
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html> Message delivered to
[hidden email]