6M CW

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

6M CW

w7aqk
I understand how Jim and Ken feel.  However, I find myself
on both sides of the fence.  Sometimes I get antsy wanting
to work a particular grid square, but other times I get into
a longer exchange--maybe the other station is in a location
of particular interest, or whatever.  Of course, not many
folks are that hungry for my grid square, but I suppose they
may be hungry for the other person's grid square.  Thing is,
though, not everyone (me included) is knocking themselves
out trying to grab "all" the grid squares.  I save that
approach for the contests usually.  Different folks have
different ways of enjoying the opening, and a little
chit-chat may be how they do it.  So, maybe we all just need
to take a deep breath.

Jim's absolutely right about the CW portion of the band.
It's usually "all business" down there, and lots of fun too.
Weak signals are much easier to grab, etc.  My biggest
complaint about the CW "portion" is that we seemed to be
squeezed into a fairly narrow segment--50,090 to 50,100.  I
realize we can go further up or down, but most don't seem to
do it.  Also you start running into the beacons when you get
lower, and when the band is good, there are a bunch of them
coming in.  Nevertheless, I do go down lower sometimes, but
my QSO rate drops because others don't seem to be listening
down further.  Going up apparently "infringes" on a DX
window for SSB.  Anyway, I think we should spread out some,
downward probably, when the band gets good like this,
beacons or no beacons.  That's probably heresy!  Of course,
I'd also like to hear a lot more folks try CW too!

Dave W7AQK


-----------------------------------------------------
Jim Brown wrote:

On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 08:29:08 -0700 (PDT), Ken McGuire wrote:

>I was frustrated at how slow the chats were on SSB (FM was
>even worse) -
>it seemed like they were wasting a perfectly good band
>opening ragchewing

Yep. Same here. Often, an opening on any given path may be
there only long
enough to exchange the grid and report. It's quite
frustrating to wait to
call a station that was S9, then S7, then S5, then S3, then
fumes, while
the time is filled with innanity.

>When I turned down to the CW portion of the band, it almost
>sounded like
>a CW contest weekend.

Yes. I've gotten to the point that I spend most of my 6M
efforts on CW,
only tuning up to the SSB portion of the band when nothing
is happening on
CW. And thanks in part to the proliferation of K3s, there is
a lot more CW
activity than there was only 5 years ago.

73, Jim K9YC


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 6M CW

Jim Brown-10
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 11:26:40 -0700, David Yarnes wrote:

> However, I find myself
>on both sides of the fence.  Sometimes I get antsy wanting
>to work a particular grid square, but other times I get into
>a longer exchange

First, there's no fence. Do what you wanna. :) But do what makes
sense in the context of conditions. When 6M is open, conditions can
be WILDLY variable, and ragchewing with a station who might not be
there in 30 seconds is a pretty dumb idea. If you want to rag chew,
do it with someone who is NOT subject to rapid fading, or on a band
that is better suited to it.

Second, there are MANY ways to enjoy ham radio. Some of my ham
friends only enjoy building stations, or writing software, or
building equipment, or fixing equipment, or teaching new hams.
Others enjoy DXing, or collecting counties, or states, or whatever.
Others enjoy contesting. Or rag chewing.

One thing that turns me on is seeing my station working well in
challenging situations, like 160M DX, and 6M grids. I like
contesting for the same reason. Different strokes for different
folks. Do what YOU wanna, but don't put down those who wanna do
something different, and whatever side of the hobby you pursue, be
a good neighbor!

73, Jim K9YC



______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 6M CW

Edward R Cole
In reply to this post by w7aqk
Comparing 6m to 17m is not very fair.  My impression of 17m is its an
extension of 20m in nature and use.

Some regard 6m is our lowest VHF band; others as the highest HF
band.  IMO it is neither.  I find line-of-sight propagation quite
inferior to 2m and even 70cm.  As a band with ionospheric effects
they are so rare that it hardly qualifies as a propagation mode (Of
course you would have to withstand 355 days of no propagation to the
ten or less that we get up here in Alaska to appreciate my comment).

So ... when the band opens, "everyone" wants to work DX, and that is
"me".  So I get a back-to-back string of QSO's from 20-30 stations in
CA.  I worked CA on the first contact so after the band closes, I
have worked one state.  Or 35 JA stations call; same result one
country worked.  Would I enjoy exchanging a few more items other than
call, name, RST and grid?  Not going to happen because I am DX.

Rag chews on 6m are with fellow Alaskans over a 30-mile radius when
the band is closed.

So six meters is - short and fast!  If you are looking for a rag chew
go down in freq to HF or up to 2m.  If you want 24-hour DX, don't
expect it on 6m.  6m is days of boredom interrupted by minutes
chaos.  It is what it is.  And that is why we love it - and hate it.

Oh, well I usually don't have to wait for a station to call me - so
that is something.


73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
======================================
BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
EME: 144-600w, 432-100w, 1296-60w, 3400-fall 2010
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep [hidden email]
======================================

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html