Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
13 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

john@kk9a.com
Until K9YC's post I was not aware of the Array Solutions lightning
arrestor. They appear be a nice product. How do GDT's fail - open or
closed? If open, how do you know that they need replacement?

John KK9A

K9YC wrote:

I strongly agree with Bob's advice, EXCEPT that I've gotten really tired
of replacing Polyphasers on my high wire dipoles. I've recently switched
to the arrestors that Array Solutions sells, both because I like the
circuit better and because the gas discharge tubes are user replaceable.

The Polyphasers are feed-through types mounted to the entry panel. The
Array Solutions are mounted in a big Hoffman box, for which W6GJB built
some custom mounting brackets. It's mounted to the wall next to the
plate with the Polyphasers, with two 2-in PVC conduit stubs going
through the wall and holes drilled at the bottom of the enclosure for
coax entry.

73, Jim K9YC

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

Jim Brown-10
In my experience, they fail shorted, so it's pretty obvious.   Although
the app notes for both the ICE and Array Solutions products say that
they don't always fail shorted.

The design is based on this one, which Array Solutions used to sell, but
the ICE owner died several years ago. The circuit is shown in the link
below.  The great thing about this circuit is that the inductor
continuously discharges static.

https://www.arraysolutions.com/as-303u

73, Jim K9YC

On 1/22/2018 10:51 AM, [hidden email] wrote:
Until K9YC's post I was not aware of the Array Solutions lightning
arrestor. They appear be a nice product. How do GDT's fail - open or
closed? If open, how do you know that they need replacement?

John KK9A

K9YC wrote:

I strongly agree with Bob's advice, EXCEPT that I've gotten really tired
of replacing Polyphasers on my high wire dipoles. I've recently switched
to the arrestors that Array Solutions sells, both because I like the
circuit better and because the gas discharge tubes are user replaceable.

The Polyphasers are feed-through types mounted to the entry panel. The
Array Solutions are mounted in a big Hoffman box, for which W6GJB built
some custom mounting brackets. It's mounted to the wall next to the
plate with the Polyphasers, with two 2-in PVC conduit stubs going
through the wall and holes drilled at the bottom of the enclosure for
coax entry.

73, Jim K9YC

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

N7US
Morgan Manufacturing, which, I've heard, was the contract assembly company for ICE, is also selling some of ICE's product line.

http://www.morganmfg.us/ 

73, Jim N7US

-----Original Message-----


In my experience, they fail shorted, so it's pretty obvious.   Although the app notes for both the ICE and Array Solutions products say that they don't always fail shorted.

The design is based on this one, which Array Solutions used to sell, but the ICE owner died several years ago. The circuit is shown in the link below.  The great thing about this circuit is that the inductor continuously discharges static.

https://www.arraysolutions.com/as-303u

73, Jim K9YC

On 1/22/2018 10:51 AM, [hidden email] wrote:
Until K9YC's post I was not aware of the Array Solutions lightning arrestor. They appear be a nice product. How do GDT's fail - open or closed? If open, how do you know that they need replacement?

John KK9A

K9YC wrote:

I strongly agree with Bob's advice, EXCEPT that I've gotten really tired of replacing Polyphasers on my high wire dipoles. I've recently switched to the arrestors that Array Solutions sells, both because I like the circuit better and because the gas discharge tubes are user replaceable.

The Polyphasers are feed-through types mounted to the entry panel. The Array Solutions are mounted in a big Hoffman box, for which W6GJB built some custom mounting brackets. It's mounted to the wall next to the plate with the Polyphasers, with two 2-in PVC conduit stubs going through the wall and holes drilled at the bottom of the enclosure for coax entry.

73, Jim K9YC

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

Jim Brown-10
On 1/23/2018 9:40 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> And Morgan Manufacturing offers them with N connectors! I’m sold.

So does Array Solutions. BUT -- for HF, N connections offer no
advantages over UHF connectors.

73, Jim K9YC

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

Dr. William J. Schmidt, II
While N connectors do have some design and impedance advantages, some of us that have lived in extremely cold climates... have seen the center pins pull out of N connectors due to thermal contraction of the center conductor over distance.  A UHF or DIN connector will usually not do that.


Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ

Owner - Operator
Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC
Staunton, Illinois

Owner – Operator
Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ
Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I.
Rent it: www.VillaGrandPiton.com
Like us on Facebook!


email:  [hidden email]


-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Walter Underwood
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 2:29 PM
To: Reflector Elecraft <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

N connectors have better weatherproofing. They handle 1500 V instead of 500 V. But I mostly like them better because they are engineered instead of a historical accident. :-)

wunder
K6WRU
Walter Underwood
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)

> On Jan 23, 2018, at 10:15 AM, Jim Brown <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> On 1/23/2018 9:40 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
>> And Morgan Manufacturing offers them with N connectors! I’m sold.
>
> So does Array Solutions. BUT -- for HF, N connections offer no advantages over UHF connectors.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

Jim Brown-10
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
On 1/23/2018 10:29 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> N connectors have better weatherproofing.

How does that matter for connections inside a weatherproof enclosure
that mounts the arrestors?  They also have the problem of cable
migration from the connector.

> They handle 1500 V instead of 500 V.

In 60 years of hamming, I've never seen a quality UHF connector that
arced. Of course, I've never run more than 1.5kW, and I try to use
antennas that are close to resonance.  :)

> But I mostly like them better because they are engineered instead of a historical accident.:-)

The technical superiority of N-connectors for use at HF is a wild
exaggeration, to the extent of being an urban myth. Yes, there is a
SMALL impedance difference at a junction, but it simply doesn't matter
at 6M and below, both because the difference in Zo is relatively small,
because the length is small as a fraction of a wavelength, and because
as frequency increases, small mismatches are reduced by the loss in the
feedline (and NOT loss due to mismatch).

There is, of course, a FICTIONAL loss called "mismatch loss," which
shows up in the lab with test equipment that is carefully engineered to
have 50 ohm output Z. But the output Z of real world transmitters is
rarely 50 ohms -- it's usually a lot lower.  Funny -- because it isn't
real, we didn't learn about it in our transmission lines classes back in
the '60s.

What matters a lot more is the QUALITY of the connector. Smart hams
don't use el-cheapo, non-branded connectors. Except for receive
antennas, I use only soldered Amphenol 83-1SP connectors and mating
Amphenol jacks and Amphenol adapters.

73, Jim K9YC


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

john@kk9a.com
In reply to this post by john@kk9a.com
Pin retraction may depend on your coax. I use a number of N connectors and I
have not seen this occur with Belden 8267 or with the various sizes of
Heliax at my station.

John KK9A


K9ZC wrote:

While N connectors do have some design and impedance advantages, some of us
that have lived in extremely cold climates... have seen the center pins pull
out of N connectors due to thermal contraction of the center conductor over
distance.  A UHF or DIN connector will usually not do that.


Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ

Owner - Operator
Big Signal Ranch - K9ZC
Staunton, Illinois

Owner - Operator
Villa Grand Piton - J68HZ
Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I.
Rent it: www.VillaGrandPiton.com
Like us on Facebook!

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

Josh Fiden
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
N are easier to install than UHF (IMHO), easier to tell that they're installed correctly, and it's difficult to find good quality UHF in larger dia for RG214. UHF for Heliax are very expensive while surplus NOS N-connectors are common.

That's why I prefer them. I would say UHF offer no advantages over N !

73,
Josh W6XU

Sent from my mobile device

> On Jan 23, 2018, at 10:15 AM, Jim Brown <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On 1/23/2018 9:40 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
>> And Morgan Manufacturing offers them with N connectors! I’m sold.
>
> So does Array Solutions. BUT -- for HF, N connections offer no advantages over UHF connectors.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

UHF connectors [was: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor]

Alan Bloom
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
On 01/23/2018 11:05 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On 1/23/2018 10:29 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
...

>> But I mostly like them better because they are engineered instead of a
>> historical accident.:-)
>
> The technical superiority of N-connectors for use at HF is a wild
> exaggeration, to the extent of being an urban myth. Yes, there is a
> SMALL impedance difference at a junction, but it simply doesn't matter
> at 6M and below, both because the difference in Zo is relatively small,
> because the length is small as a fraction of a wavelength, and because
> as frequency increases, small mismatches are reduced by the loss in the
> feedline (and NOT loss due to mismatch).
>
> There is, of course, a FICTIONAL loss called "mismatch loss," which
> shows up in the lab with test equipment that is carefully engineered to
> have 50 ohm output Z.  ...
Yup.  Here is a posting I made 25 years ago that has actual data:


From: ... (Alan Bloom)

Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1992 23:03:13 GMT

Subject: The Truth about UHF Connectors

Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Rosa, CA

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc



Ya gotta feel sorry for UHF connectors. Recent strings on this notes

group lambasted them as worthless at VHF and above, and barely tolerable

at HF. One poster called them "5 dB attenuators", and many agreed that

there must be some sort of conspiracy among ham equipment manufacturers

to inflict such garbage connectors on the amateur community.



Today I finally remembered to bring some UHF adapters from home so I

could do some relative measurements of UHF versus type-N.  As expected,

the type-N showed lower insertion loss at high frequencies, but the UHF

connectors were hardly "5 dB attenuators."



For the test I connected an HP8753 RF network analyzer through two short

BNC cables into the following arrangement:

    _______    ____________    ___________    ____________    _______

   |       |  | BNC female |  | N female- |  | N male to  |  |       |

__| 10 dB |__| to N male  |__| N female  |__| BNC female |__| 10 dB |__

   | Atten.|  | adapter    |  | adapter   |  | adapter    |  | Atten.|

   |_______|  |____________|  |___________|  |____________|  |_______|



Then I repeated the measurement with the N adapters replaced with UHF.

I normalized the measurements by replacing the 3 adapters with a BNC

double-female. (That is, this was assumed to have 0 dB loss.)



Since two N or UHF adapters were used, I assume the loss per connector

is half the total. The vertical scale was .1 dB/division, so I estimated

the insertion loss to the nearest .01 dB or so:



             --------- Type N --------   ---------- UHF ----------

FREQ (MHz)  TOTAL  LOSS PER CONNECTOR   TOTAL  LOSS PER CONNECTOR

1.8         0 dB   0 dB                 0 dB   0 dB

30          0      0                    0      0

100         0      0                    0      0

150         0      0                    0.02   0.01

200         0      0                    0.03   0.015

450         0      0                    0.18   0.09

600         0      0                    0.26   0.13

900         0      0                    0.66   0.33

1000        0.05   0.025                0.8    0.4

1300        0.1    0.05                 0.86   0.43

1600        0.05   0.025                0.5    0.25

2000        0.05   0.025                0.02   0.01



Insertion loss increases until about 1300 MHz, and then starts to

decrease until it is almost zero for the UHF connector at 2 GHz!  At

that frequency, the connectors are about 1/4 wave long (1 inch,

assuming .66 velocity factor), so I assume that the two adapters are

providing a conjugate match to each other. This confirms my assumption

that the insertion loss is due to reflections (impedance mismatch), not

absorption (true power loss).



Bottom line: UHF connectors work fine through the VHF range, and are not

too bad even on the 420 MHz band if you can stand about .1 dB mismatch

loss per connector.



By the way, I did not do the full 2-port calibration on the HP8753, so

there was a couple hundredth's dB ripple in the plots. I averaged this

out by eye to come up with the numbers in the above chart.



AL N1AL



P.S. Sorry, I guess I violated the Usenet rule against posting objective

data... :=)
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

Don Wilhelm
In reply to this post by john@kk9a.com
I is not always thermal related.  Center pin retraction can also be
caused by stress on the coax.  I have seen many N male connectors where
the shield has slipped in the clamp due to tension on the coax (from the
weight of hanging or perhaps other causes).  I routinely do 2 things -
1) put a bead of silicone seal around the coax to top of the N connector
junction, and 2) support the coax in some manner about 12 inches from
the connector.

If the shield slips in the connector body, the most obvious result is
center pin retraction, but it may also be that the shield has broken (or
hanging on by a thread) allowing the coax to come partially out of the
connector.

The same problem can be found in BNC connectors.

In other words, do not let the connector take the stress of the hanging
coax weight.

Well soldered UHF connectors do not have that problem.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/23/2018 5:27 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
> Pin retraction may depend on your coax. I use a number of N connectors and I
> have not seen this occur with Belden 8267 or with the various sizes of
> Heliax at my station.
>
> John KK9A
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

Bob McGraw - K4TAX
In reply to this post by john@kk9a.com
Correct installation is usually the key.  The line must be supported no
more than 12" from the connector and NEVER at any time by the connector,
even during installation.   Also, line supports along all vertical and
horizontal runs is a must.

73

Bob, K4TAX


On 1/23/2018 4:27 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

> Pin retraction may depend on your coax. I use a number of N connectors and I
> have not seen this occur with Belden 8267 or with the various sizes of
> Heliax at my station.
>
> John KK9A
>
>
> K9ZC wrote:
>
> While N connectors do have some design and impedance advantages, some of us
> that have lived in extremely cold climates... have seen the center pins pull
> out of N connectors due to thermal contraction of the center conductor over
> distance.  A UHF or DIN connector will usually not do that.
>
>
> Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ
>
> Owner - Operator
> Big Signal Ranch - K9ZC
> Staunton, Illinois
>
> Owner - Operator
> Villa Grand Piton - J68HZ
> Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I.
> Rent it: www.VillaGrandPiton.com
> Like us on Facebook!
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]
>


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

Ken G Kopp
In reply to this post by john@kk9a.com
UG-1185's have captive center pins.

73 !

Ken - K0PP

On Jan 23, 2018 15:28, <[hidden email]> wrote:

Pin retraction may depend on your coax. I use a number of N connectors and I
have not seen this occur with Belden 8267 or with the various sizes of
Heliax at my station.

John KK9A


K9ZC wrote:

While N connectors do have some design and impedance advantages, some of us
that have lived in extremely cold climates... have seen the center pins pull
out of N connectors due to thermal contraction of the center conductor over
distance.  A UHF or DIN connector will usually not do that.


Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ

Owner - Operator
Big Signal Ranch - K9ZC
Staunton, Illinois

Owner - Operator
Villa Grand Piton - J68HZ
Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I.
Rent it: www.VillaGrandPiton.com
Like us on Facebook!

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor

chrisrut
In reply to this post by john@kk9a.com
For those who might be interested, http://kf7p.com/KF7P/Welcome.html sells
Morgan Arrestors and many other excellent products for towers, entrance
panels, grounding, ferrite chokes, etc. He also has an excellent set of
references on his Tech page.

No, no connection to the company; just a satisfied customer.

73 Chris NW6V
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]