|
Am I the only one who prefers to tune 'Up the Band' into a CW signal rather than
from a frequency above a CW signal to receive it? Apparently not, since there is a 'CW-REV' button on the K3 as well as on many other radios. Over the past 5 decades, I've become accustomed to tuning in CW stations from below the signal's transmitted frequency. Not all radios define 'CW' and 'CW-REV' the same way. The Kenwood TS850 and other Kenwood transceivers have the user tuning into CW signals from below. Using narrow bandwith, a CW signal quickly disappears as the receiver is tuned above the signal frequency. Icom radios and the K3 are the opposite, where the 'CW' mode has the user tuning in CW stations from above the signal's frequency. Users who wish to tune from below and into a signal must switch to 'CW-REV'. This is not a problem since the K3 remembers this preference on each band. However, when rig controlling software programs such as CT, N1MM, RXCLUS, etc. are used, every time the 'CW' mode command is sent by the program to the K3, the radio switches to the 'CW' mode rather that the prefered 'CW-REV' mode. Would it be possible to have a CONFIG setting which would allow the user to define 'CW' and 'CW-REV' modes, that is, the way of tuning into CW signal frequencies (lower to higher or higher to lower)? If this option was available, when radio controlling software sent a generic 'CW' mode change to the K3, it would respond by switching to the user's prefered way (CW or CW-REV) of tuning into CW signals. What say? 73, Rich - K1HTV ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Rich,
The K3 CW tuning is the way I like it - tune to a higher frequency and the pitch of the note gets higher. It just makes sense to me, and I hate radios that do it 'backwards'. 73, Don W3FPR Rich - K1HTV wrote: > Am I the only one who prefers to tune 'Up the Band' into a CW signal rather than > from a frequency above a CW signal to receive it? Apparently not, since there is > a 'CW-REV' button on the K3 as well as on many other radios. > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
The CW-REV as configured on the K3 is essentially upper side band
receive which is the way many receivers/transceivers such as my FT-101E were configured back in the Dark Ages. I suspect many people are used to it. Furthermore, the K3 tunes backwards compared to the FT-101E. I've had the K3 since October, 2009 and I seem to have adjusted, perhaps because the FT-101E hasn't been turned on since I got the K3. I wonder why? Dunc, W5DC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Don Wilhelm-4
Even though it is a matter of personal preference and not really critical, I
agree with Rich, I find it easier to visualize it this way: higher pitch means the signal is higher in frequency and it fits with (CW-REV) you center the signal by turning VFO or RIT up(clockwise), or center it in your passband if you shift it up (clockwise) or notch an interferer to the right (clockwise) of the center frequency (all three match) If you use plain CW and the signal is high pitch then you center the signal by turning VFO or RIT down(COUNTERCLOCKWISE), or center in your passband if you shift it up (clockwise) -well reversed!- or notch an interferer to the right (clockwise) of the center (not all three movements match) Juan, EA5RS/EE5E -----Mensaje original----- De: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] En nombre de Don Wilhelm Enviado el: jueves, 29 de abril de 2010 23:58 Para: Rich - K1HTV CC: [hidden email]; [hidden email] Asunto: Re: [Elecraft] CW/CW-REV config option Rich, The K3 CW tuning is the way I like it - tune to a higher frequency and the pitch of the note gets higher. It just makes sense to me, and I hate radios that do it 'backwards'. 73, Don W3FPR Rich - K1HTV wrote: > Am I the only one who prefers to tune 'Up the Band' into a CW signal rather than > from a frequency above a CW signal to receive it? Apparently not, since there is > a 'CW-REV' button on the K3 as well as on many other radios. > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 4576 (20091105) __________ Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system http://www.nod32.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Don Wilhelm-4
For DXers, the standard for CW has always been USB. IE a higher pitch tone means a station higher in frequency. Very useful when looking for the "spot" when the DX is split and listening up. Also standard. CW USB on the K3 is indeed CW REV. LSB CW, for DXing, is considered backwards. To each his own.
73 - Steve WB6RSE On Apr 29, 2010, at 2:58 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: The K3 CW tuning is the way I like it - tune to a higher frequency and the pitch of the note gets higher. It just makes sense to me, and I hate radios that do it 'backwards'. 73, Don W3FPR Rich - K1HTV wrote: > Am I the only one who prefers to tune 'Up the Band' into a CW signal rather than > from a frequency above a CW signal to receive it? Apparently not, since there is > a 'CW-REV' button on the K3 as well as on many other radios. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by k1htv
<quote author="Rich - K1HTV">
"Would it be possible to have a CONFIG setting which would allow the user to define 'CW' and 'CW-REV' modes, that is, the way of tuning into CW signal frequencies (lower to higher or higher to lower)? If this option was available, when radio controlling software sent a generic 'CW' mode change to the K3, it would respond by switching to the user's prefered way (CW or CW-REV) of tuning into CW signals". Rich has described the problem very well, and I support his proposal. Some other rigs, such as the Icom ProIII, have this as a user-selectable menu option. 73, Paul EI5DI |
|
In reply to this post by k1htv
I am using CW-REV on my K3 with N1MM.
On N1MM: Config/mode Control = Select Use Radio Mode (Default) 73 ----- Original Message ----- From: Rich - K1HTV To: [hidden email] Cc: [hidden email] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:42 PM Subject: [Elecraft] CW/CW-REV config option Am I the only one who prefers to tune 'Up the Band' into a CW signal rather than from a frequency above a CW signal to receive it? Apparently not, since there is a 'CW-REV' button on the K3 as well as on many other radios. Over the past 5 decades, I've become accustomed to tuning in CW stations from below the signal's transmitted frequency. Not all radios define 'CW' and 'CW-REV' the same way. The Kenwood TS850 and other Kenwood transceivers have the user tuning into CW signals from below. Using narrow bandwith, a CW signal quickly disappears as the receiver is tuned above the signal frequency. Icom radios and the K3 are the opposite, where the 'CW' mode has the user tuning in CW stations from above the signal's frequency. Users who wish to tune from below and into a signal must switch to 'CW-REV'. This is not a problem since the K3 remembers this preference on each band. However, when rig controlling software programs such as CT, N1MM, RXCLUS, etc. are used, every time the 'CW' mode command is sent by the program to the K3, the radio switches to the 'CW' mode rather that the prefered 'CW-REV' mode. Would it be possible to have a CONFIG setting which would allow the user to define 'CW' and 'CW-REV' modes, that is, the way of tuning into CW signal frequencies (lower to higher or higher to lower)? If this option was available, when radio controlling software sent a generic 'CW' mode change to the K3, it would respond by switching to the user's prefered way (CW or CW-REV) of tuning into CW signals. What say? 73, Rich - K1HTV ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by k1htv
There is one radio on the market that I am aware of that uses UCW and LCW
thus with the press of a button you have either of your choices. Your preference doesn't seem at all strange to me. The software that I use to control the radio offeres UCW and LCW modes. 73 Bob, K4TAX ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich - K1HTV" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Cc: <[hidden email]> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 4:42 PM Subject: [Elecraft] CW/CW-REV config option > Am I the only one who prefers to tune 'Up the Band' into a CW signal > rather than > from a frequency above a CW signal to receive it? Apparently not, since > there is > a 'CW-REV' button on the K3 as well as on many other radios. > > Over the past 5 decades, I've become accustomed to tuning in CW stations > from > below the signal's transmitted frequency. Not all radios define 'CW' and > 'CW-REV' the same way. The Kenwood TS850 and other Kenwood transceivers > have the > user tuning into CW signals from below. Using narrow bandwith, a CW signal > quickly disappears as the receiver is tuned above the signal frequency. > Icom > radios and the K3 are the opposite, where the 'CW' mode has the user > tuning in > CW stations from above the signal's frequency. Users who wish to tune > from > below and into a signal must switch to 'CW-REV'. This is not a problem > since the > K3 remembers this preference on each band. > > However, when rig controlling software programs such as CT, N1MM, RXCLUS, > etc. > are used, every time the 'CW' mode command is sent by the program to the > K3, the > radio switches to the 'CW' mode rather that the prefered 'CW-REV' mode. > > Would it be possible to have a CONFIG setting which would allow the user > to > define 'CW' and 'CW-REV' modes, that is, the way of tuning into CW signal > frequencies (lower to higher or higher to lower)? If this option was > available, > when radio controlling software sent a generic 'CW' mode change to the K3, > it > would respond by switching to the user's prefered way (CW or CW-REV) of > tuning > into CW signals. > > What say? > > 73, > Rich - K1HTV > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by k1htv
On 4/29/2010 5:42 PM, Rich - K1HTV wrote: > However, when rig controlling software programs such as CT, N1MM, > RXCLUS, etc. are used, every time the 'CW' mode command is sent by > the program to the K3, the radio switches to the 'CW' mode rather > that the prefered 'CW-REV' mode. There is no need to change the K3. N1MM Logger and other well designed programs (e.g., DXLab Suite) allow the user to select CW or CW-Rev as the default when changing bands or "clicking on a spot." RTFM ... Why add something more to the K3 that will just provide more chance of confusing the user when well designed software deals with the radio just fine as it is? 73, ... Joe, W4TV ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by wb6rse1
Steve,
Interesting -- I never really gave it much thought, except I preferred LSB CW for the reason I stated - it keeps *my* head straight. It may be a thing more common to the QRP community. Anyway, Wayne designed the K2 and K3 normal CW to be LSB, and the K1 is always LSB. In the K2, just hold the REV button and it switches sidebands, and on the K3 the sideband is remembered per band, so that can keep all of us happy. If you want it the other way 'round, just hold the REV button, and you have your preference. 73, Don W3FPR [hidden email] wrote: > For DXers, the standard for CW has always been USB. IE a higher pitch tone means a station higher in frequency. Very useful when looking for the "spot" when the DX is split and listening up. Also standard. CW USB on the K3 is indeed CW REV. LSB CW, for DXing, is considered backwards. To each his own. > > 73 - Steve WB6RSE > > > On Apr 29, 2010, at 2:58 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > > The K3 CW tuning is the way I like it - tune to a higher frequency and > the pitch of the note gets higher. It just makes sense to me, and I > hate radios that do it 'backwards'. > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by k1htv
I agree Rich. After a string of Kenwood rigs starting with a TS 820S, I've gotten used to tuning from the bottom of the band. MacLoggerDX allows me to map the program so that clicking on a CW spot delivers CW-R.
73 Gary W7TEA
73,
Gary W7TEA K3 #1001, #5763 |
|
In reply to this post by k1htv
>Am I the only one who prefers to tune 'Up the Band' into a CW signal...
>...when rig controlling software programs such as CT, N1MM, RXCLUS, etc... >...radio switches to the 'CW' mode rather that the prefered 'CW-REV' mode. >Would it be possible to have a CONFIG setting which would allow... My pet peeve too! I whined about this a number of months ago, and was assured that it was on the "feature request" list. Nothing yet - maybe on the next revision (hint, hint). VE7XF ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by k1htv
>There is no need to change the K3...
>Why add something more to the K3 that will just provide more chance of confusing the user... Well then, let's just freeze the K3 as it is today, and not make further software or hardware changes. VE7XF ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Bob McGraw - K4TAX
Bob,
If that "one" radio is something other than an Elecraft brand, change that "one" to "at least 5". The K2 and the K3 will switch sidebands at the touch of a button too (actually a hold). My Yaesu 847 has quick CW sideband switching as does the FT-817, and my Yaesu FT-900 also allows the user to select the CW sideband, but it is not as quick and easy as on the K2 or K3 or the other Yaesus. I have all mine set to LSB CW! The Yaesu default is to USB CW, while the K2 and K3 default is to LSB CW - it is very easily changed - just hold the REV button. Interaction with logging software may be a different consideration, read the documentation for your preferred application for the details. Some will follow the transceiver settings, while others may try to "do it their way". If you have problems with that aspect, contact the software author. 73, Don W3FPR Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote: > There is one radio on the market that I am aware of that uses UCW and LCW > thus with the press of a button you have either of your choices. Your > preference doesn't seem at all strange to me. The software that I use to > control the radio offeres UCW and LCW modes. > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Ralph Parker
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
|
In reply to this post by Don Wilhelm-4
No problem here with the radios or the logging software or the remote
control software. At least there is a choice. 73 Bob, K4TAX ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Wilhelm" <[hidden email]> To: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <[hidden email]> Cc: "Rich - K1HTV" <[hidden email]>; <[hidden email]>; <[hidden email]> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 6:53 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW/CW-REV config option > Bob, > > If that "one" radio is something other than an Elecraft brand, change that > "one" to "at least 5". The K2 and the K3 will switch sidebands at the > touch of a button too (actually a hold). My Yaesu 847 has quick CW > sideband switching as does the FT-817, and my Yaesu FT-900 also allows the > user to select the CW sideband, but it is not as quick and easy as on the > K2 or K3 or the other Yaesus. I have all mine set to LSB CW! > > The Yaesu default is to USB CW, while the K2 and K3 default is to LSB CW - > it is very easily changed - just hold the REV button. > Interaction with logging software may be a different consideration, read > the documentation for your preferred application for the details. Some > will follow the transceiver settings, while others may try to "do it their > way". If you have problems with that aspect, contact the software author. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote: >> There is one radio on the market that I am aware of that uses UCW and LCW >> thus with the press of a button you have either of your choices. Your >> preference doesn't seem at all strange to me. The software that I use to >> control the radio offeres UCW and LCW modes. >> > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Ralph Parker
Rather let's not keep adding nit-picking changed to Wayne's list so he can concentrate on more important items that add functionality rather than repackage the same old features. This is, after all, an Elecraft transceiver. If you want a rig that operates just like a Kenwood, go buy a Kenwood. Similarly, if you want a radio that operates like an Icom, buy an Icom. It's not a matter of freezing the K3, it's a matter of smart application of resources and spending time to provide options to copy the idiosyncrasies of other vendor's user interface is not a good use of resources. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 4/29/2010 7:50 PM, Ralph Parker wrote: >> There is no need to change the K3... >> Why add something more to the K3 that will just provide more chance of > confusing the user... > > Well then, let's just freeze the K3 as it is today, and not make further > software or hardware changes. > > VE7XF > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
I would also agree to leave the K3 as-is. I don't see why there needs to be more ways to set USB and LSB.... just hold CW-Rev to get to the other one.....
73, LS W5QD |
|
In reply to this post by Ralph Parker
I also thought that Wayne put it on the "feature request" list sometime
last fall. I hope he did. CW REV seems natural to me and with some effort I got Logic 8 to handle it but it would be so much easier, at the risk of confusing some individuals, if there were a configuration entry to flip the definitions of CW and CW REV. I love the people who say "I don't use that - you don't need it - don't implement it!". Please, if you don't want it, just don't use it if it gets implemented. 73, Ted, W2ZK On 4/29/2010 7:43 PM, Ralph Parker wrote: >> Am I the only one who prefers to tune 'Up the Band' into a CW signal... >> ...when rig controlling software programs such as CT, N1MM, RXCLUS, etc... >> ...radio switches to the 'CW' mode rather that the prefered 'CW-REV' mode. >> Would it be possible to have a CONFIG setting which would allow... >> > My pet peeve too! > I whined about this a number of months ago, and was assured that it was on > the "feature request" list. > Nothing yet - maybe on the next revision (hint, hint). > > VE7XF > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
>I love the people who say "I don't use that - you don't need it - don't
implement it!".< Mostly they're just saying "the rig already does that - RTFM" hi hi. 73, LS W5QD |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
