|
I hardly see the value of extrapolating to the absurd to try to defend your position. Dave AB7E On 4/29/2010 4:50 PM, Ralph Parker wrote: > Well then, let's just freeze the K3 as it is today, and not make further > software or hardware changes. > > VE7XF > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
CW / CW-R can also be a very useful QRM fighting tool. the K3 does not centre the wider roofing filters on the CW passband to maximise opposite sideband rejection Switching from CW to CW -R (or vice/versa) places that interfering signal that is above you (in pitch) below you (in pitch) where the lower skirt of the filter (&roofing filter) may be much more effective at filtering out the interfering signal. This is a great trick if you only have wide roofing filters in your k3, it's less useful (but sometimes still helpful) even if your K3 is fitted with narrow roofing filters -- 73 Brendan EI6IZ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by lstavenhagen
Folks, lets end this thread. No need to beat it to death.
73, Eric Elecraft List Moderator ---- On 4/29/2010 8:27 PM, lstavenhagen wrote: > >> I love the people who say "I don't use that - you don't need it - don't >> > implement it!".< > > Mostly they're just saying "the rig already does that - RTFM" hi hi. > > 73, > LS > W5QD > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
I prefer CW-R and only occasionally use CW if there is some close-in sig on the high side that I'm
having trouble filtering away. In Logger32, I have configured the "Setup bands & modes" CW options to read "CW-R", which works fine when QSYing on DXCluster spots etc. The only thing it doesn't fix for me is automatically monitoring the NCDXF beacons when the rig uses CW - no big deal really. [I have another minor irritation with DATA-REV mode being selected sometimes for some reason I haven't fathomed yet. Again, no big deal so long as I notice - which generally happens after I've been sending RTTY CQs for ages without reply!!]. 73 Gary ZL2iFB > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Joe > Subich, W4TV > Sent: Friday, 30 April 2010 11:07 AM > To: [hidden email]; [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW/CW-REV config option > > > On 4/29/2010 5:42 PM, Rich - K1HTV wrote: > > However, when rig controlling software programs such as CT, N1MM, > > RXCLUS, etc. are used, every time the 'CW' mode command is sent by > > the program to the K3, the radio switches to the 'CW' mode rather > > that the prefered 'CW-REV' mode. > > There is no need to change the K3. N1MM Logger and other > well designed > programs (e.g., DXLab Suite) allow the user to select CW or CW-Rev as > the default when changing bands or "clicking on a spot." RTFM ... > > Why add something more to the K3 that will just provide more chance of > confusing the user when well designed software deals with the radio > just fine as it is? > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by k1htv
W5QD
Hi LS, The request for consideration sent to Elecraft Support was not for a new way to set USB and LSB (or CW and CW-REV). It had to do with the way that they and other tranceiver manufacturers have defined how their radios tune into a CW signal. Some have defined CW as if it were being received in the way a USB signal is received. In this case, one tunes into the CW signal from a lower frequency and after tuning through and past the frequency, the signal rapidly disappears. Other manufacturers have implemented CW as if it were a LSB signal with the user tuning down towards the CW signal, it it disappearing after tuning past it towards a lower frequency. Like many other CW operators, we have no problem pushing the CW-REV button to select our prefered option of tuning UP the band and into CW signals. There are many software programs which simply send a mode switch command as 'CW'. Some programs have a 'CW-REV' mode switch command available, but many don't. I chose to use three pieces of radio controlling software which suit my operational needs, two of which simply send a 'CW' command. The problem is that when a program sends a 'CW' command, the K3 switches from my prefered way to tuning (CW-REV ) back to (CW). Having to push the CW-REV button after each software mode switch is an annoyance in casual operation but becomes much more of a pain while operating in a contest environment. In the future, I may use other programs which I find to be excellent and fit my operating needs, but may NOT have the CW/CW-REV option. I have chosen the track of making a request to the manufacturer of my K3 radio and not to multiple software producers. The transceiver manufacturers are not in agreement on this CW/CW-REV issue. The result is that the 'CW' mode on these radios will performs in opposite ways of tuning into CW signals as described above. My suggestion to Elecraft Support was that they consider this difference and give the user the option of DEFINING how the CW and CW-REV commands respond to reflect their tuning preferences. As you can tell from the response on this topic, there are CW users on both sides of this issue. Some have suggested that having this option will confuse some users. Well, there are already plenty of options which now do this. But those same options have allowed many users to optimize the K3 to their operating preferences. One of the reasons why Elecraft is the great success that they are today is because they listen to the suggestions and recommendations of the users of the equipment that they manufacture. 73, Rich - K1HTV = = = From: lstavenhagen <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW/CW-REV config option To: [hidden email] Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I would also agree to leave the K3 as-is. I don't see why there needs to be more ways to set USB and LSB.... just hold CW-Rev to get to the other one..... 73, LS W5QD ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
On 5/1/2010 10:12 AM, Rich - K1HTV wrote: > Some programs have a 'CW-REV' mode switch command available, but > many don't. I chose to use three pieces of radio controlling > software which suit my operational needs, two of which simply send > a 'CW' command. The issue should not be one of the K3 changing its interface to suit software. The authors of the software should update their software to support the hardware - just as they have done over the years to support other new hardware. The K3 is not the only transceiver that defaults to "LSB" CW reception. Again, this is yet another case of "gotta make the K3 act just like my YaeComWood." If you want a Kenwood, buy a Kenwood. 73, ... Joe, W4TV ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Or is it a matter of asking the manufacturer/programmer which has a
reputation of responsiveness? To be fair to others, particularly the many utility programmers, I have had very good luck with a request for a program option. I HAVE managed to get various things added. Particularly when I started out with "this is one of my favorite programs." which was true since I wouldn't bother to request a change unless I used it a lot. Someone else got MM logger to add the use rev CW switch when the K3 became a major player. K3 IS now a major player...go ask your programmers to add "use rev cw"? See what they say. 73, Guy. On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On 5/1/2010 10:12 AM, Rich - K1HTV wrote: > > Some programs have a 'CW-REV' mode switch command available, but > > many don't. I chose to use three pieces of radio controlling > > software which suit my operational needs, two of which simply send > > a 'CW' command. > > The issue should not be one of the K3 changing its interface to suit > software. The authors of the software should update their software > to support the hardware - just as they have done over the years to > support other new hardware. > > The K3 is not the only transceiver that defaults to "LSB" CW reception. > > Again, this is yet another case of "gotta make the K3 act just like > my YaeComWood." If you want a Kenwood, buy a Kenwood. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
