CW Sweepstakes contest

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

CW Sweepstakes contest

Craig Smith
Enjoyed reading of Elecraft owner’s experiences during the contest.  I can
offer a “historical” perspective.  This used to be my favorite contest, as I
was a CW geek (W2BHP, K2RE) and really enjoyed it even with my limited
antenna setup.  Got out of ham radio about 20 years ago, but am starting to
get the bug again.  Listened for about 8 hours with my ICOM R75 and random
wire and certainly got the urge to be able to jump in again! 
 
Some comments on the “top ten” list:  The “new” technology certainly makes a
difference, both positively and negatively.  The item that I noticed most is
the continual CQ calling with limited listening by many many stations.  At
the risk of sounding like an old fart, back in my day we had to call CQ by
hand rather than by pushing a button on the memory keyer.  Now as fatigue
sets in it is easier to push the button rather than listen and search the
band for stations you haven’t worked.  On the positive side, automatic
antenna tuners have made the long tune-ups almost a thing of the past.  I
must say that in all my hours of listening, I didn’t hear any objectionable
tune-ups.  As far as discourteous operators, etc. I’d say it was not any
worse or better than it was back in the “old days”.   Mostly polite.
 
So look for me next November with a new license and K2 or KX1!
 
I’d like to see more results here from Elecraft owners in the contest,
especially QRP.  I heard 75 sections here in Colorado.

Craig D. Smith



_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: CW Sweepstakes contest

Paul Heller-2
Craig D. Smith wrote:

>difference, both positively and negatively.  The item that I noticed most is
>the continual CQ calling with limited listening by many many stations.
>  
>

Ditto - I heard 3 or 4 cases where the station (note I didn't say
operator, 'cause I'm not sure there was one at the moment) was sending
CQ SS in a loop, apparently never listening, because they didn't answer
any of the callers.  No big deal - I  just kept moving up the band in
S&P mode, but I saw this enough times that it got my attention.

/Paul
 W3PH

--

Paul Heller
[hidden email]

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: CW Sweepstakes contest

Craig Rairdin
On all of those I assume it's because their receiver isn't as good as my K2.
It's the Elecraft curse: You can often hear people who can't hear you.

In fact, bad receivers account for about half the things on the top-10 list.


Craig
NZ0R

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Paul Heller
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:03 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW Sweepstakes contest


Craig D. Smith wrote:

>difference, both positively and negatively.  The item that I noticed most
is
>the continual CQ calling with limited listening by many many stations.
>  
>

Ditto - I heard 3 or 4 cases where the station (note I didn't say
operator, 'cause I'm not sure there was one at the moment) was sending
CQ SS in a loop, apparently never listening, because they didn't answer
any of the callers.  No big deal - I  just kept moving up the band in
S&P mode, but I saw this enough times that it got my attention.

/Paul
 W3PH

--

Paul Heller
[hidden email]

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: CW Sweepstakes contest

Ron D'Eau Claire-2
Craig NZ0R wrote:

On all of those I assume it's because their receiver isn't as good as my K2.
It's the Elecraft curse: You can often hear people who can't hear you.

In fact, bad receivers account for about half the things on the top-10 list.

-------------------

Bad ears too, or untrained 'ears'. When I said that Contesting didn't
particularly teach "operating skills" I meant "general operating skills" of
course. It takes real talent to determine that the burst of QRN that just
erupted from the speaker was really the QRQ exchange from another contact.

Or maybe it was just a burst of QRN.

Oh well, it's in the log now...

It's certainly true that a situation like the SS stresses operators and
their abilities, and when people are stressed they make mistakes or choices
they might not otherwise, and they certainly run into situations they don't
encounter in 'normal' operations.

That was my original point: contest operating requires many skills not
frequently used in normal operating, and normal operating requires many
skills not frequently used in contests.


Ron AC7AC




_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: CW Sweepstakes contest

n6wg
In reply to this post by Craig Smith
Hi Craig
We sure welcome you back to the fold.  Please post your call when you get
it.

I heartily recommend the K2 if you have any expectiations of getting back
into
contesting.  It really is a "kick butt" radio, whether at QRP or 100w
levels.

I think you will get more bang for your buck out of the K2, as it will allow
you to QRO if you wish, work all bands 10-160, and has an excellent computer
interface to access the logging program of your choice.

Had an absolute ball in the cw SS this weekend with my 5w K2.

Welcome home :-)
73, Bob N6WG
The Little Station with Attitude

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Craig D. Smith
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 6:45 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [Elecraft] CW Sweepstakes contest


Enjoyed reading of Elecraft owner’s experiences during the contest.  I can
offer a “historical” perspective.  This used to be my favorite contest, as I
was a CW geek (W2BHP, K2RE) and really enjoyed it even with my limited
antenna setup.  Got out of ham radio about 20 years ago, but am starting to
get the bug again.  Listened for about 8 hours with my ICOM R75 and random
wire and certainly got the urge to be able to jump in again! 
 
Some comments on the “top ten” list:  The “new” technology certainly makes a
difference, both positively and negatively.  The item that I noticed most is
the continual CQ calling with limited listening by many many stations.  At
the risk of sounding like an old fart, back in my day we had to call CQ by
hand rather than by pushing a button on the memory keyer.  Now as fatigue
sets in it is easier to push the button rather than listen and search the
band for stations you haven’t worked.  On the positive side, automatic
antenna tuners have made the long tune-ups almost a thing of the past.  I
must say that in all my hours of listening, I didn’t hear any objectionable
tune-ups.  As far as discourteous operators, etc. I’d say it was not any
worse or better than it was back in the “old days”.   Mostly polite.
 
So look for me next November with a new license and K2 or KX1!
 
I’d like to see more results here from Elecraft owners in the contest,
especially QRP.  I heard 75 sections here in Colorado.

Craig D. Smith



_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com