Can Elecraft take over the global HF ham radio business ?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Can Elecraft take over the global HF ham radio business ?

Marinos
Dear fellow Elecrafters,
This is going to be an out of the ordinary post, and I am sure will get
quite a bit of criticism, but since there has been a recent discussion about
looking for ways to satisfy as many potential customers as possible (with
the QRO kits etc), I would like to hear some opinions about this:

What are the reasons for the popularity of the K2 radio not being equal to
the Japanese made rigs worldwide ? Yes, the rig is very popular but its
production/sale numbers are just about 5000, a rather small number compared
to any of the commercially available units.

In my view, which may be wrong of course, the answer is that the K2 is not
considered by the majority of the hams worldwide as the radio that can
substitute all others in HF in their shack. It is rather seen as a
specialized 2nd or 3rd "luxury" radio.

And here comes the question:
Would it be possible and financially profitable for Elecraft to introduce a
full feature transceiver kit that can maintain the well known RX advantages
of the K2 while adding other features that have come to be considered as
"standard" in modern radios ?

* General HF coverage
* IF manual Notch
* Continuously variable PBT / Rx Bandwidth
* Maybe 200W RF output
* Band (manual) preselector

Of course many people will argue about the usefulness of these features, but
having a radio with the above would make it an extremely attractive choice
as the only radio for many more hams worldwide, and since the vast majority
of us like to build equipment, certainly would prefer it over ready made
"black-boxes".....

Just some philosophical thoughts, and topics of debate.
73 to all,
Marinos, ki4gin


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Can Elecraft take over the global HF ham radio business ?

NR5A
Why?? I can't see anything wrong with the way it is QRP. I prefer it over
the rice boxes, for one thing I don't need 10,000 bells and whistles, I
don't even use many of the K2's extra features. I like it cause even stuipid
me and fix it, or get tons of help on this group. Why mess it up?? Guess I
just don't get what your getting at. I probably should not have even posted
this.

Jerry - NR5A - South DAkota
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marinos Markomanolakis, M.D." <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:51 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Can Elecraft take over the global HF ham radio business
?


> Dear fellow Elecrafters,
> This is going to be an out of the ordinary post, and I am sure will get
> quite a bit of criticism, but since there has been a recent discussion
about
> looking for ways to satisfy as many potential customers as possible (with
> the QRO kits etc), I would like to hear some opinions about this:
>
> What are the reasons for the popularity of the K2 radio not being equal to
> the Japanese made rigs worldwide ? Yes, the rig is very popular but its
> production/sale numbers are just about 5000, a rather small number
compared
> to any of the commercially available units.
>
> In my view, which may be wrong of course, the answer is that the K2 is not
> considered by the majority of the hams worldwide as the radio that can
> substitute all others in HF in their shack. It is rather seen as a
> specialized 2nd or 3rd "luxury" radio.
>
> And here comes the question:
> Would it be possible and financially profitable for Elecraft to introduce
a
> full feature transceiver kit that can maintain the well known RX
advantages

> of the K2 while adding other features that have come to be considered as
> "standard" in modern radios ?
>
> * General HF coverage
> * IF manual Notch
> * Continuously variable PBT / Rx Bandwidth
> * Maybe 200W RF output
> * Band (manual) preselector
>
> Of course many people will argue about the usefulness of these features,
but
> having a radio with the above would make it an extremely attractive choice
> as the only radio for many more hams worldwide, and since the vast
majority

> of us like to build equipment, certainly would prefer it over ready made
> "black-boxes".....
>
> Just some philosophical thoughts, and topics of debate.
> 73 to all,
> Marinos, ki4gin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: [hidden email]
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
>


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Can Elecraft take over the global HF ham radio business ?

Earl W Cunningham
In reply to this post by Marinos
Jerry, NR5A wrote:

"Why??"
==========
Because there's thousands of hams like KI4GIN and me who like bells and
whistles and are willing to pay for them..

It may not appeal to NR5A and others, but there's a BIG market that it
WOULD appeal to.

73, de Earl, K6SE
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Can Elecraft take over the global HF ham radio business ?

Bob Sosin
In reply to this post by Marinos

My guess is that reasons lie more in the greater number of hams interested
in purchasing a factory-made box vs. a project, rather than any world-wide
hunger for continuously variable PBT / Rx Bandwidth or General HF coverage.
Bob,
KD4WNQ
-----Original Message-----


What are the reasons for the popularity of the K2 radio not being equal to
the Japanese made rigs worldwide ?


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Can Elecraft take over the global HF ham radio business ?

k0wa@swbell.net
In reply to this post by Marinos


I think any manufacturer in the cottage business of
Ham Radio would like to sell 5,000 units.  I am sure
ICOM would like to sell that many PRO IIIs.  Five
thousand units is not a small amount in the business.

Just a point.

Lee - K0Wa


Common sense is in short supply - get some and use it.
If you can't find any common sense, ask somebody who owns some.
- Lee Buller
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Can Elecraft take over the global HF ham radio business ?

g4ilo-2
In reply to this post by Marinos
Do you think Icom has not sold 5,000 PRO III's? I find that surprising.
I have worked more 756PROs than K2s.

I'm surprised that it would even be profitable to make such a rig in
such small numbers. The bells and whistles probably add more to the R&D
cost than the basic RF engineering, and I think there are a lot more
custom made parts in it.
--
Julian, G4ILO
G4ILO's Shack: http://www.tech-pro.net/g4ilo

Lee Buller <[hidden email]> wrote:

I think any manufacturer in the cottage business of
Ham Radio would like to sell 5,000 units.  I am sure
ICOM would like to sell that many PRO IIIs.  Five
thousand units is not a small amount in the business.

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Can Elecraft take over the global HF ham radio business ?

W5RCM - Ron
In reply to this post by Marinos
I think the Japanese rigs sell because you take it out of the box, plug
it in, and start making QSOs.  Comparing kits and finished radios is
kind of like comparing a basket full of apples with a sapling!
--
72, Ron McDowell - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
w5rcm at volente dot us
Austin TX / Hermanus ZA


On 29 Apr 2005 02:51:22 +0000, [Marinos Markomanolakis, M.D. <[hidden email]>] wrote:
What are the reasons for the popularity of the K2 radio not being
equal to the Japanese made rigs worldwide?
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com