DSP REV C and D

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

DSP REV C and D

Rich-4
Would I be correct that the difference between DSP C and D is that C is
lacking the LPF rolloff at 4 Khz?

Assuming I am correct should I expect better rx audio quality with D?

Rich
K3RWN
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: DSP REV C and D

Grant Youngman
Not necessarily.  I have a “C” board in my K3, but I also have the LPF installed.  If you are the original owner of the radio, then I suppose you’d know if you installed the LPF board or not.  If you bought the radio 2nd hand, then you’ll need to see if the LPF board was or was not installed by the previous owner.

Grant NQ5T


> On Sep 8, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Rich <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Would I be correct that the difference between DSP C and D is that C is lacking the LPF rolloff at 4 Khz?
>
> Assuming I am correct should I expect better rx audio quality with D?
>
> Rich
> K3RWN
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: DSP REV C and D

Don Wilhelm-4
In reply to this post by Rich-4
Rich,

It all depends on how you define "audio quality".
To the SWL who wants to hear the maximum audio spectrum possible, then
the LPF may not be desirable.
But for the ham whose ears get tired of listening to the hiss of higher
audio frequencies after operating for a substantial time, the LPF is
desirable.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 9/8/2015 1:33 PM, Rich wrote:
> Would I be correct that the difference between DSP C and D is that C
> is lacking the LPF rolloff at 4 Khz?
>
> Assuming I am correct should I expect better rx audio quality with D?
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]