I'm certain this is not an original idea, but I wonder if somebody will ever come out with a dedicated all-in-one notebook-sized portable rig for the FT-type digital modes. I'm pretty new to FT8/4 but I find it interesting that when I'm operating it all I ever do with my K3 is turn it on and make band changes since everything else is done on my computer. I wouldn't even need to do that much on the K3 if WSJT-X had a button to make band changes. Possibly such a unit might look like: 1. 12 volt operation (10 watts output) for portable use 2. large enough screen to be practical 3. running modified (mouseless) version of WSJT-X to allow up/down arrow keys for: a. band selection b. frequency change in 2 KHz increments c. mode selection d. contact selection from activity window e. TX1-TX6 sequence override f. transmit enable/disable 4. a button to momentarily press for log, press/hold to autolog 5. USB port to run modified WSJT-X from flash drive for easy upgrade and log transfer 6. internal antenna tuner (could be manual) 7. etc. Rigs dedicated to specific modes have never been very popular, but I suspect that FTx might change that and I suspect an integrated low power SDR version could end up being fairly inexpensive. A side advantage is that audio levels would be preset in hardware and we'd see less overdrive situations. ;) Anybody know if there is already something like this out there? I can find small inexpensive transceivers designed for FT8, but they still require a separate computer. Just some ramblings on a rainy day ... 73, Dave AB7E ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
WSJT-X does, in fact, provide a way to do band changes without touching the
radio. There's a pull down menu on the main window just to the left of the frequency. Click the little down arrow on that box, select the band, and the radio will follow. The Frequencies tab under Files..Settings menu must be configured with the frequencies you plan to use on each band. Regarding the idea of a dedicated, all-in-one rig for FT modes, I suspect the reason that such single-purpose radios have never caught on is that radio and computer technology often evolve at different rates. For instance, you might wind up in a couple years with a box that contains a perfectly good radio, but is stuck with a computer that's not suitable for digital mode flavor of the month. Keeping them separate is far more flexible,at the expense of some integration and configuration work. Maybe there's a market for such a device...maybe not. I can't imagine there would be enough demand to justify it, but then again, maybe that's why I'm not in the ham radio manufacturing business :) 73 de W0ZF On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 3:41 PM David Gilbert <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I'm certain this is not an original idea, but I wonder if somebody will > ever come out with a dedicated all-in-one notebook-sized portable rig > for the FT-type digital modes. I'm pretty new to FT8/4 but I find it > interesting that when I'm operating it all I ever do with my K3 is turn > it on and make band changes since everything else is done on my > computer. I wouldn't even need to do that much on the K3 if WSJT-X had > a button to make band changes. > > Possibly such a unit might look like: > > 1. 12 volt operation (10 watts output) for portable use > > 2. large enough screen to be practical > > 3. running modified (mouseless) version of WSJT-X to allow up/down > arrow keys for: > > a. band selection > b. frequency change in 2 KHz increments > c. mode selection > d. contact selection from activity window > e. TX1-TX6 sequence override > f. transmit enable/disable > > 4. a button to momentarily press for log, press/hold to autolog > > 5. USB port to run modified WSJT-X from flash drive for easy upgrade > and log transfer > > 6. internal antenna tuner (could be manual) > > 7. etc. > > Rigs dedicated to specific modes have never been very popular, but I > suspect that FTx might change that and I suspect an integrated low power > SDR version could end up being fairly inexpensive. A side advantage is > that audio levels would be preset in hardware and we'd see less > overdrive situations. ;) > > Anybody know if there is already something like this out there? I can > find small inexpensive transceivers designed for FT8, but they still > require a separate computer. > > Just some ramblings on a rainy day ... > > 73, > Dave AB7E > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by David Gilbert
You’d probably end up with a computer anyway (except perhaps for portable operations) to do all the functions other than the ones that WSJT handles. For example, I check propagation, point my antenna, receive cluster and RBN spots, maintain a log of tens of thousands of QSOs in various modes and keep track of award progress, upload QSO data to Clublog in real time, upload to LOTW after each session and update my log with results, receive WhatsApp messages, and more.
If you had an onboard computer, you would still end up dumping data to an external one on a regular basis anyway. I think the division of labor between a rig and external computer is just about right. Now if you are backpacking and just making a few QSOs for fun, that’s another story. Victor 4X6GP > On 10 Aug 2019, at 23:40, David Gilbert <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > I'm certain this is not an original idea, but I wonder if somebody will ever come out with a dedicated all-in-one notebook-sized portable rig for the FT-type digital modes. I'm pretty new to FT8/4 but I find it interesting that when I'm operating it all I ever do with my K3 is turn it on and make band changes since everything else is done on my computer. I wouldn't even need to do that much on the K3 if WSJT-X had a button to make band changes. > > Possibly such a unit might look like: > > 1. 12 volt operation (10 watts output) for portable use > > 2. large enough screen to be practical > > 3. running modified (mouseless) version of WSJT-X to allow up/down arrow keys for: > > a. band selection > b. frequency change in 2 KHz increments > c. mode selection > d. contact selection from activity window > e. TX1-TX6 sequence override > f. transmit enable/disable > > 4. a button to momentarily press for log, press/hold to autolog > > 5. USB port to run modified WSJT-X from flash drive for easy upgrade and log transfer > > 6. internal antenna tuner (could be manual) > > 7. etc. > > Rigs dedicated to specific modes have never been very popular, but I suspect that FTx might change that and I suspect an integrated low power SDR version could end up being fairly inexpensive. A side advantage is that audio levels would be preset in hardware and we'd see less overdrive situations. ;) > > Anybody know if there is already something like this out there? I can find small inexpensive transceivers designed for FT8, but they still require a separate computer. > > Just some ramblings on a rainy day ... > > 73, > Dave AB7E > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by David Gilbert
> On Aug 10, 2019, at 13:40, David Gilbert <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > I'm certain this is not an original idea, but I wonder if somebody will ever come out with a dedicated all-in-one notebook-sized portable rig for the FT-type digital modes. I'm pretty new to FT8/4 but I find it interesting that when I'm operating it all I ever do with my K3 is turn it on and make band changes since everything else is done on my computer. I wouldn't even need to do that much on the K3 if WSJT-X had a button to make band changes. > > Possibly such a unit might look like: > > 1. 12 volt operation (10 watts output) for portable use > > 2. large enough screen to be practical > > 3. running modified (mouseless) version of WSJT-X to allow up/down arrow keys for: > > a. band selection > b. frequency change in 2 KHz increments > c. mode selection > d. contact selection from activity window > e. TX1-TX6 sequence override > f. transmit enable/disable > > 4. a button to momentarily press for log, press/hold to autolog > > 5. USB port to run modified WSJT-X from flash drive for easy upgrade and log transfer > > 6. internal antenna tuner (could be manual) > > 7. etc. > > Rigs dedicated to specific modes have never been very popular, but I suspect that FTx might change that and I suspect an integrated low power SDR version could end up being fairly inexpensive. A side advantage is that audio levels would be preset in hardware and we'd see less overdrive situations. ;) > > Anybody know if there is already something like this out there? I can find small inexpensive transceivers designed for FT8, but they still require a separate computer. > > Just some ramblings on a rainy day ... > > 73, > Dave AB7E > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by David Gilbert
Sorry, try again.
There was a fellow on the Facebook KX2 group who described an WSJT setup consisting of a KX2, RPi3 and an iPad. Pretty slick and light weight and with a little repackaging could be an all-in-one. 73, Brian, K0DTJ > On Aug 10, 2019, at 13:40, David Gilbert <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > I'm certain this is not an original idea, but I wonder if somebody will ever come out with a dedicated all-in-one notebook-sized portable rig for the FT-type digital modes. I'm pretty new to FT8/4 but I find it interesting that when I'm operating it all I ever do with my K3 is turn it on and make band changes since everything else is done on my computer. I wouldn't even need to do that much on the K3 if WSJT-X had a button to make band changes. > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Brian Hunt
Another way to connect the two worlds of computers and radio would be to
add the radio to the computer as a card on the motherboard. Or plug it into a USB port on a laptop like a flash drive. It is not quite a dedicated machine to do one thing but you will be able to upgrade the two parts separately. You have the advantage of the power of the computer you choose while the radio does not need to be that complex. GL, Kevin. KD5ONS - On 8/10/19 9:40 PM, Brian Hunt wrote: > >> On Aug 10, 2019, at 13:40, David Gilbert <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >> I'm certain this is not an original idea, but I wonder if somebody will ever come out with a dedicated all-in-one notebook-sized portable rig for the FT-type digital modes. I'm pretty new to FT8/4 but I find it interesting that when I'm operating it all I ever do with my K3 is turn it on and make band changes since everything else is done on my computer. I wouldn't even need to do that much on the K3 if WSJT-X had a button to make band changes. >> >> Possibly such a unit might look like: >> >> 1. 12 volt operation (10 watts output) for portable use >> >> 2. large enough screen to be practical >> >> 3. running modified (mouseless) version of WSJT-X to allow up/down arrow keys for: >> >> a. band selection >> b. frequency change in 2 KHz increments >> c. mode selection >> d. contact selection from activity window >> e. TX1-TX6 sequence override >> f. transmit enable/disable >> >> 4. a button to momentarily press for log, press/hold to autolog >> >> 5. USB port to run modified WSJT-X from flash drive for easy upgrade and log transfer >> >> 6. internal antenna tuner (could be manual) >> >> 7. etc. >> >> Rigs dedicated to specific modes have never been very popular, but I suspect that FTx might change that and I suspect an integrated low power SDR version could end up being fairly inexpensive. A side advantage is that audio levels would be preset in hardware and we'd see less overdrive situations. ;) >> >> Anybody know if there is already something like this out there? I can find small inexpensive transceivers designed for FT8, but they still require a separate computer. >> >> Just some ramblings on a rainy day ... >> >> 73, >> Dave AB7E >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [hidden email] > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Vic Rosenthal
"Now if you are backpacking and just making a few QSOs for fun, that’s another story." That was my hypothetical intent. For vacation and portable operation, I'd probably be using a non-directive antenna, I'd settle for whatever propagation there was, I'd be making FAR less than tens of thousands of QSOs, and I already suggested transferring logs to my desktop computer via a USB flash drive. The idea would be to avoid dragging along a computer and hassle with all the cabling. There all kinds of folks here on this reflector using KX2's and KX3's interfaced with laptops and iPads for portable operation. That just seems like a sloppy way to do it when a rather simple all-in-one unit with a much simpler radio could handle the same task less expensively. Dave AB7E On 8/10/2019 9:30 PM, Vic Rosenthal wrote: > You’d probably end up with a computer anyway (except perhaps for portable operations) to do all the functions other than the ones that WSJT handles. For example, I check propagation, point my antenna, receive cluster and RBN spots, maintain a log of tens of thousands of QSOs in various modes and keep track of award progress, upload QSO data to Clublog in real time, upload to LOTW after each session and update my log with results, receive WhatsApp messages, and more. > If you had an onboard computer, you would still end up dumping data to an external one on a regular basis anyway. I think the division of labor between a rig and external computer is just about right. > Now if you are backpacking and just making a few QSOs for fun, that’s another story. > > Victor 4X6GP > >> On 10 Aug 2019, at 23:40, David Gilbert <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >> I'm certain this is not an original idea, but I wonder if somebody will ever come out with a dedicated all-in-one notebook-sized portable rig for the FT-type digital modes. I'm pretty new to FT8/4 but I find it interesting that when I'm operating it all I ever do with my K3 is turn it on and make band changes since everything else is done on my computer. I wouldn't even need to do that much on the K3 if WSJT-X had a button to make band changes. >> >> Possibly such a unit might look like: >> >> 1. 12 volt operation (10 watts output) for portable use >> >> 2. large enough screen to be practical >> >> 3. running modified (mouseless) version of WSJT-X to allow up/down arrow keys for: >> >> a. band selection >> b. frequency change in 2 KHz increments >> c. mode selection >> d. contact selection from activity window >> e. TX1-TX6 sequence override >> f. transmit enable/disable >> >> 4. a button to momentarily press for log, press/hold to autolog >> >> 5. USB port to run modified WSJT-X from flash drive for easy upgrade and log transfer >> >> 6. internal antenna tuner (could be manual) >> >> 7. etc. >> >> Rigs dedicated to specific modes have never been very popular, but I suspect that FTx might change that and I suspect an integrated low power SDR version could end up being fairly inexpensive. A side advantage is that audio levels would be preset in hardware and we'd see less overdrive situations. ;) >> >> Anybody know if there is already something like this out there? I can find small inexpensive transceivers designed for FT8, but they still require a separate computer. >> >> Just some ramblings on a rainy day ... >> >> 73, >> Dave AB7E >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Whoever designs such a radio could save a few bucks by not putting a speaker
in it. Barry W2UP -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by David Gilbert
I see a wonderful building project here. Lets start out with a
Raspberry Pi -- for me the latest version with plenty of compute power for FT8 It draws about 2-3A @ 12V. Add in a HDMI display (from Adafruit) at about 0.8A @ 12V, some kind of sound card (if the display doesn't have sound), and a USB keyboard. (I would go with a separate keyboard for its typing advantages. YMMV) We now have a functioning computer. The next question is what we do about a radio and here comes the camel's nose into the tent. The simplest solution is a single-mode, single-band dedicated radio. One of my favorite radios is the Small Wonders Labs PSK-20. (Unfortunately the kit is SK.) It tuned the PSK subband at 14.070 and nothing else. It had no UI, everything was done on the computer. It should be simple to retune it for 14.074 and run FT8. But suppose we want more than that. There are any number of QRP radio kits around that might do. Or even a KX2. But the KX2 wouldn't be enough for my friend Jim, K6EI who likes to go into the woods of Washington state and run QRP 160M. He'd need at least a KX3. Regardless of what radio is chosen, it would be easy to leave enough space around the computer board to allow for future computer upgrades. (I assume the computer will become obsolete faster than the radio.) Have fun building. 73 Bill AE6JV On 8/11/19 at 1:11 AM, [hidden email] (David Gilbert) wrote: >"Now if you are backpacking and just making a few QSOs for fun, that’s another story." > >That was my hypothetical intent. For vacation and portable >operation, I'd probably be using a non-directive antenna, I'd >settle for whatever propagation there was, I'd be making FAR >less than tens of thousands of QSOs, and I already suggested >transferring logs to my desktop computer via a USB flash drive. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | Since the IBM Selectric, keyboards have gotten 408-356-8506 | steadily worse. Now we have touchscreen keyboards. www.pwpconsult.com | Can we make something even worse? ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by David Gilbert
First off, since when does WSJT-X not have a band change function?
Your idea is fun to think about, but you can get darn close with a Raspberry Pi hooked up to your K3 or KX3 or whatever, remote controlled from your smart phone via VNC. John K0JD On 8/10/2019 15:40, David Gilbert wrote: > > I'm certain this is not an original idea, but I wonder if somebody > will ever come out with a dedicated all-in-one notebook-sized portable > rig for the FT-type digital modes. I'm pretty new to FT8/4 but I find > it interesting that when I'm operating it all I ever do with my K3 is > turn it on and make band changes since everything else is done on my > computer. I wouldn't even need to do that much on the K3 if WSJT-X > had a button to make band changes. > > Possibly such a unit might look like: > > 1. 12 volt operation (10 watts output) for portable use > > 2. large enough screen to be practical > > 3. running modified (mouseless) version of WSJT-X to allow up/down > arrow keys for: > > a. band selection > b. frequency change in 2 KHz increments > c. mode selection > d. contact selection from activity window > e. TX1-TX6 sequence override > f. transmit enable/disable > > 4. a button to momentarily press for log, press/hold to autolog > > 5. USB port to run modified WSJT-X from flash drive for easy upgrade > and log transfer > > 6. internal antenna tuner (could be manual) > > 7. etc. > > Rigs dedicated to specific modes have never been very popular, but I > suspect that FTx might change that and I suspect an integrated low > power SDR version could end up being fairly inexpensive. A side > advantage is that audio levels would be preset in hardware and we'd > see less overdrive situations. ;) > > Anybody know if there is already something like this out there? I can > find small inexpensive transceivers designed for FT8, but they still > require a separate computer. > > Just some ramblings on a rainy day ... > > 73, > Dave AB7E > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Yeah, I had never noticed that button over to the far left. My mistake. And I've received probably a dozen similar suggestions on how to accomplish the same thing with multiple pieces of gear, which wasn't my thought at all. I'm sorry I brought it up. Dave AB7E On 8/11/2019 6:09 PM, John Seboldt K0JD wrote: > First off, since when does WSJT-X not have a band change function? > > Your idea is fun to think about, but you can get darn close with a > Raspberry Pi hooked up to your K3 or KX3 or whatever, remote > controlled from your smart phone via VNC. > > John K0JD > > On 8/10/2019 15:40, David Gilbert wrote: >> >> I'm certain this is not an original idea, but I wonder if somebody >> will ever come out with a dedicated all-in-one notebook-sized >> portable rig for the FT-type digital modes. I'm pretty new to FT8/4 >> but I find it interesting that when I'm operating it all I ever do >> with my K3 is turn it on and make band changes since everything else >> is done on my computer. I wouldn't even need to do that much on the >> K3 if WSJT-X had a button to make band changes. >> >> Possibly such a unit might look like: >> >> 1. 12 volt operation (10 watts output) for portable use >> >> 2. large enough screen to be practical >> >> 3. running modified (mouseless) version of WSJT-X to allow up/down >> arrow keys for: >> >> a. band selection >> b. frequency change in 2 KHz increments >> c. mode selection >> d. contact selection from activity window >> e. TX1-TX6 sequence override >> f. transmit enable/disable >> >> 4. a button to momentarily press for log, press/hold to autolog >> >> 5. USB port to run modified WSJT-X from flash drive for easy upgrade >> and log transfer >> >> 6. internal antenna tuner (could be manual) >> >> 7. etc. >> >> Rigs dedicated to specific modes have never been very popular, but I >> suspect that FTx might change that and I suspect an integrated low >> power SDR version could end up being fairly inexpensive. A side >> advantage is that audio levels would be preset in hardware and we'd >> see less overdrive situations. ;) >> >> Anybody know if there is already something like this out there? I can >> find small inexpensive transceivers designed for FT8, but they still >> require a separate computer. >> >> Just some ramblings on a rainy day ... >> >> 73, >> Dave AB7E >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [hidden email] > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
http://crkits.com/ D4D DSB and a Raspberry Pi 4B maybe? Just got mine to
build. Might need a LP filter addition to keep it right. Bret/N4SRN -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
If someone needs a PSK 20 or 80 Jon, [hidden email] told me last night he has both unbuilt kits. He may be willing to part with them. We were discussing the unbuilt kits we have stuck away in drawers and cupboards.
Dave K8WPE David J. Wilcox K8WPE’s iPad > On Aug 12, 2019, at 4:07 AM, MaverickNH <[hidden email]> wrote: > > http://crkits.com/ D4D DSB and a Raspberry Pi 4B maybe? Just got mine to > build. Might need a LP filter addition to keep it right. > > Bret/N4SRN > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |