Diversity mode preamp
Locked
123
123
 
|
On 11/20/2011 4:48 PM, Tom W8JI wrote:
> Is there a way to lock the preamp and attenuator functions I've missed much of the traffic in this thread, BUT -- I have integrated Beverages into my contest station using one of the excellent preamps that I believe you designed for DX Engineering. The result is that the signal level from my Beverages is usually a good match for the level from my full size transmit antennas, so I don't need to do much level matching within the K3s. I developed this system soon after I moved here and installed the Beverages, and was running TS850s (with the N6TR mod for RX antenna input), and later with MPs. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by Phil Hystad-3
So, what the K3 really needs then is a contest oriented application on a
computer. Maybe something rich like PowerSDR but works with the K3 in a manner where contesting features (logging and contest log management) along with sophisticated macro control from a visual controls perspective.>>> No. That would never fly for this application. Operators need buttons or toggle switches that serve one function. Hands are too busy. <<< Indeed, now that I think about it, this would be a great application if it were designed to be configurable per each contester. Arrangements of controls on the screen, sophisticated macro control via custom U/I, and other nifty features.>>> This is a different requirement, and may be one that totally conflicts with the target market. It may not be workable. Operators want a big panel, big knobs, and one easy to see and hit button that does one task. The last thing that sells into this application is a computer keyboard, mouse, or touch screen application. This is why people with ten or fifteen radios gravitate to the big boxes even though raw performance is less. <<Thus, instead of sitting in front of the K3 with its small format presentation and the overload commands on the buttons, the computer would be much more useful if all K3 functions were available.>> It would be much less useful. The computer screen is full of windows already, and clicking outside the window will stop the system from responding. What would be useful is a toggle switch from 1945. What would be painful is an iPad or keyboard function. :-) What would be super, but I realize can never happen, is a big front panel with one control for one function. What would be almost as good is being able to program buttons for dedicated single functions. Like I use M1-M4 for bandwidth changes. It is much better than the rotary knob to just poke a preset button. There are many things that never get used, but I am not aware of any way to program them to a different use. Like I never use the ATU, because I don't have one. I never use the ANT, only have one port. Never use the NB or NR, because with a crowded band it just kills RX performance. Moving things off the panel, unless it is something up out of the way on another dedicated panel, is not an option. 73 Tom ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
> I've missed much of the traffic in this thread, BUT -- I have integrated
> Beverages into my contest station using one of the excellent preamps > that I believe you designed for DX Engineering. The result is that the > signal level from my Beverages is usually a good match for the level > from my full size transmit antennas, so I don't need to do much level > matching within the K3s. I developed this system soon after I moved > here and installed the Beverages, and was running TS850s (with the N6TR > mod for RX antenna input), and later with MPs. A good system always balances the signal levels in. Always. I can't imagine ever having antenna choices that have not been relatively equalized in noise floor. The problem is sometimes there is a need to increase or reduce gain on both RX channels immediately, in just fractions of a second time. Say a strong station comes on for a while, or we change directions and a modest signal becomes strong and starts to overload, or one direction has 20 dB more noise. Another case is the noise floor has crept up, and the op was too busy to notice and now suddenly does but is busy. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by W8JI
But that sequence must have serial command equivalents which could then be supported by logging programs or made into a button macro. Making a macro that turns on or off both preamps or both attenuators also ought to be easy. The important thing is that it is a specific series of commands or button presses that have no side effects beyond the intended operation.
AB2TC - Knut
|
|
|
On 11/22/2011 10:06 AM, ab2tc wrote:
> But that sequence must have serial command equivalents which could then be > supported by logging programs or made into a button macro. Making a macro > that turns on or off both preamps or both attenuators also ought to be easy. > The important thing is that it is a specific series of commands or button > presses that have no side effects beyond the intended operation. This might lead to a solution, Knut. The first question is, are there commands in firmware to do what Tom needs? I'm pretty N1MM will send a command string on the serial port (including a USB converted serial), and the operation could be assigned to almost anything on the keyboard with a Hotkey program like the one that K1TTT and N2IC recommend. Is it called AutoHotKey? An example that I KNOW is possible is triggering the DVR memories from F-Keys. The macros to do this are long and a PITA to type into N1MM, but they work fine. Tom -- perhaps ask about this on the N1MM list, or ping N2IC and K1TTT directly. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by W8JI
I would spring for a big front panel only (with some mounting
attachments) that remotes the K3 over a piece of CAT5. Unplug the CAT5, it goes normal. Function of buttons configurable. Add a "null" front to replace the regular front panel of the K3 together with a back plane for the normal front panel to interface the normal front panel to the rest of a K3. This would allow a seamless use of the smaller or larger "remote" front panel. Add an internet front for the radio and an internet back for the front panel , and run the radio from anywhere over a LAN or the internet. Publish the interfacing and let the world write K3 front panel programs for K3's with "null" front panels. This would be in keeping with Elecraft's modular, only buy it if you want it, approach. Put three or four radios up on the same CRT. 73, Guy. On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Tom W8JI <[hidden email]> wrote: > So, what the K3 really needs then is a contest oriented application on a > computer. Â Maybe something rich like PowerSDR but works with the K3 in a > manner where contesting features (logging and contest log management) along > with sophisticated macro control from a visual controls perspective.>>> > > No. That would never fly for this application. > > Operators need buttons or toggle switches that serve one function. Hands are > too busy. > > <<< > Indeed, now that I think about it, this would be a great application if it > were designed to be configurable per each contester. Â Arrangements of > controls on the screen, sophisticated macro control via custom U/I, and > other nifty features.>>> > > This is a different requirement, and may be one that totally conflicts with > the target market. It may not be workable. > > Operators want a big panel, big knobs, and one easy to see and hit button > that does one task. The last thing that sells into this application is a > computer keyboard, mouse, or touch screen application. This is why people > with ten or fifteen radios gravitate to the big boxes even though raw > performance is less. > > <<Thus, instead of sitting in front of the K3 with its small format > presentation and the overload commands on the buttons, the computer would be > much more useful if all K3 functions were available.>> > > It would be much less useful. The computer screen is full of windows > already, and clicking outside the window will stop the system from > responding. > > What would be useful is a toggle switch from 1945. What would be painful is > an iPad or keyboard function. Â :-) > > What would be super, but I realize can never happen, is a big front panel > with one control for one function. What would be almost as good is being > able to program buttons for dedicated single functions. Like I use M1-M4 for > bandwidth changes. It is much better than the rotary knob to just poke a > preset button. > > There are many things that never get used, but I am not aware of any way to > program them to a different use. Like I never use the ATU, because I don't > have one. I never use the ANT, only have one port. Never use the NB or NR, > because with a crowded band it just kills RX performance. > > Moving things off the panel, unless it is something up out of the way on > another dedicated panel, is not an option. > > 73 Tom > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
YES, YES, YES, Sounds like my request from 2 years ago......Pse a BIG front panel for us old goats, contesters, etc....
jim K3SW On Nov 22, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: > I would spring for a big front panel only (with some mounting > attachments) that remotes the K3 over a piece of CAT5. Unplug the > CAT5, it goes normal. Function of buttons configurable. Add a "null" > front to replace the regular front panel of the K3 together with a > back plane for the normal front panel to interface the normal front > panel to the rest of a K3. This would allow a seamless use of the > smaller or larger "remote" front panel. Add an internet front for the > radio and an internet back for the front panel , and run the radio > from anywhere over a LAN or the internet. Publish the interfacing and > let the world write K3 front panel programs for K3's with "null" front > panels. This would be in keeping with Elecraft's modular, only buy it > if you want it, approach. Put three or four radios up on the same CRT. > > 73, Guy. > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Tom W8JI <[hidden email]> wrote: >> So, what the K3 really needs then is a contest oriented application on a >> computer. Maybe something rich like PowerSDR but works with the K3 in a >> manner where contesting features (logging and contest log management) along >> with sophisticated macro control from a visual controls perspective.>>> >> >> No. That would never fly for this application. >> >> Operators need buttons or toggle switches that serve one function. Hands are >> too busy. >> >> <<< >> Indeed, now that I think about it, this would be a great application if it >> were designed to be configurable per each contester. Arrangements of >> controls on the screen, sophisticated macro control via custom U/I, and >> other nifty features.>>> >> >> This is a different requirement, and may be one that totally conflicts with >> the target market. It may not be workable. >> >> Operators want a big panel, big knobs, and one easy to see and hit button >> that does one task. The last thing that sells into this application is a >> computer keyboard, mouse, or touch screen application. This is why people >> with ten or fifteen radios gravitate to the big boxes even though raw >> performance is less. >> >> <<Thus, instead of sitting in front of the K3 with its small format >> presentation and the overload commands on the buttons, the computer would be >> much more useful if all K3 functions were available.>> >> >> It would be much less useful. The computer screen is full of windows >> already, and clicking outside the window will stop the system from >> responding. >> >> What would be useful is a toggle switch from 1945. What would be painful is >> an iPad or keyboard function. :-) >> >> What would be super, but I realize can never happen, is a big front panel >> with one control for one function. What would be almost as good is being >> able to program buttons for dedicated single functions. Like I use M1-M4 for >> bandwidth changes. It is much better than the rotary knob to just poke a >> preset button. >> >> There are many things that never get used, but I am not aware of any way to >> program them to a different use. Like I never use the ATU, because I don't >> have one. I never use the ANT, only have one port. Never use the NB or NR, >> because with a crowded band it just kills RX performance. >> >> Moving things off the panel, unless it is something up out of the way on >> another dedicated panel, is not an option. >> >> 73 Tom >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
> This might lead to a solution, Knut. The first question is, are there
> commands in firmware to do what Tom needs? Tom doesn't really need anything. Guest operators are the real worry. Things have to be easy. :-) ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
I'll study the command reference manual when I get home and see if the needed commands are there.
AB2TC - Knut
|
|
|
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
> The first question is, are there commands in firmware to do what Tom > needs? Yes, Preamp Off: PA0;PA$0; Preamp On: PA1;PA$1; Attenuator Off: RA00;RA$00; Attenuator On: RA01;RA$01; It's quite simple if one reads the K3 Programmer's Reference instead of blindly demand changes to the K3 firmware. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 11/22/2011 1:16 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > On 11/22/2011 10:06 AM, ab2tc wrote: >> But that sequence must have serial command equivalents which could then be >> supported by logging programs or made into a button macro. Making a macro >> that turns on or off both preamps or both attenuators also ought to be easy. >> The important thing is that it is a specific series of commands or button >> presses that have no side effects beyond the intended operation. > > This might lead to a solution, Knut. The first question is, are there > commands in firmware to do what Tom needs? I'm pretty N1MM will send a > command string on the serial port (including a USB converted serial), > and the operation could be assigned to almost anything on the keyboard > with a Hotkey program like the one that K1TTT and N2IC recommend. Is it > called AutoHotKey? An example that I KNOW is possible is triggering the > DVR memories from F-Keys. The macros to do this are long and a PITA to > type into N1MM, but they work fine. > > Tom -- perhaps ask about this on the N1MM list, or ping N2IC and K1TTT > directly. > > 73, Jim K9YC > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
On 11/22/2011 12:01 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
> Yes, Preamp Off: PA0;PA$0; > Preamp On: PA1;PA$1; > Attenuator Off: RA00;RA$00; > Attenuator On: RA01;RA$01; Is there a way to do this for both receivers? > > It's quite simple if one reads the K3 Programmer's Reference instead of > blindly demand changes to the K3 firmware. Yes. Please observe that I was not the one asking for changes, but rather asking it the commands are already there. :) It should also be noted that K6XX, a top contester with a great multi-op station and an excellent engineer, has been part of the engineering team at Elecraft for some time now. >Tom doesn't really need anything. Guest operators are the real worry. Understood, and I'm sure that XX understands that too. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by Guy, K2AV
<Tongue-in-cheek alert>
And customizable buttons like on this keyboard?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimus_Maximus_keyboard or http://ergodex.com/mainpage.htm :-) 73, Mike ab3ap On 11/22/2011 01:46 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: > I would spring for a big front panel only (with some mounting > attachments) that remotes the K3 over a piece of CAT5. Unplug the > CAT5, it goes normal. Function of buttons configurable. [...] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by wayne burdick
Wayne Burdick wrote:
>>> I use B SET to adjust preamp and other settings when using diversity. >> And using B SET is about the most cumbersome operation imaginable to >>simply check (or set) subrx preamp. >Macros? With great respect, macros are not the answer to every usability problem. Macros are enormously powerful, but they are not a substitute for cleaning up the rough edges that still remain in the K3's firmware. Macros need to be used sparingly because the K3 only has two completely uncommitted programmable keys (PF1 and PF2). Any additional macros will either block some of the normal functions of the Memory/DVR keys or else they must be executed from outside the K3. Each of those workarounds will create problems for a segment of users. And then there's the SPLIT button. The one button that above all others *should* be reassignable to a macro, is not! The K3's SPLIT button simply engages split mode and does nothing more. Every other high-end transceiver has the option to protect the user from accidentally transmitting on the same frequency as VFOA - and most DXers will want to take that option. But in the K3, this 'smart split' option requires a macro which must then be assigned to some *other* programmable key. The existing SPLIT button then becomes a booby-trap for the tired owner; or even worse, it risks a very unpleasant introduction to the K3 for someone else. I'm sorry if this reads like a rant, but someone just said "Macros?" one time too many. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by W8JI
> Yes, Preamp Off: PA0;PA$0;
> Preamp On: PA1;PA$1; > Attenuator Off: RA00;RA$00; > Attenuator On: RA01;RA$01; > Is there a way to do this for both receivers? Yes- the commands with the dollar signs ($) target the subrx. -Bruce, N1RX ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
>> Yes, Preamp Off: PA0;PA$0; >> Preamp On: PA1;PA$1; >> Attenuator Off: RA00;RA$00; >> Attenuator On: RA01;RA$01; > > Is there a way to do this for both receivers? Yes, this does it for both receivers ... for example PA0; does the main receiver and PA$0l does the KRX3. > Yes. Please observe that I was not the one asking for changes, but > rather asking it the commands are already there. :) I know that but it takes less time to read the programmers guide and write the macros in AutoHotkey (add CATASC for N1MM to send the information in the CAT stream) than has been wasted on this topic in the last two days. It would very little time to design a keyboard with microprocessor and two serial ports ... DATA IN and DATA OUT ... to set between the computer and K3 to add any given number of special commands (like the four already shown). The hardware is probably available off the shelf from X-Keys. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 11/22/2011 3:23 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > On 11/22/2011 12:01 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: >> Yes, Preamp Off: PA0;PA$0; >> Preamp On: PA1;PA$1; >> Attenuator Off: RA00;RA$00; >> Attenuator On: RA01;RA$01; > > Is there a way to do this for both receivers? >> >> It's quite simple if one reads the K3 Programmer's Reference instead of >> blindly demand changes to the K3 firmware. > > Yes. Please observe that I was not the one asking for changes, but > rather asking it the commands are already there. :) > > It should also be noted that K6XX, a top contester with a great multi-op > station and an excellent engineer, has been part of the engineering team > at Elecraft for some time now. > > >Tom doesn't really need anything. Guest operators are the real worry. > > Understood, and I'm sure that XX understands that too. > > 73, Jim K9YC > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by Mike Markowski-2
Enough knobs for even the gorilla guest operators:
Prototype for Elecraft K40000dx: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.import-radio.com/tienda/images/FTDX9000D.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.import-radio.com/tienda/index.php%3Fmanufacturers_id%3D11%26sort%3D3a%26filter_id%3D36&usg=__3hJpyX1x-8jW1GCux1vaMRlCCss=&h=271&w=684&sz=55&hl=en&start=0&sig2=ZzqVumIVR6Co86cPCyI4iw&zoom=1&tbnid=ejAsFAEeev4sxM:&tbnh=59&tbnw=149&ei=aQnMTqX0GsaztweL8rFu&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=36&vpy=201&dur=8882&hovh=141&hovw=357&tx=59&ty=165&sig=111258827441315746358&page=1&ndsp=18&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0 I hope not! 73, Bill |
|
|
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
> I know that but it takes less time to read the programmers guide and
> write the macros in AutoHotkey (add CATASC for N1MM to send the > information in the CAT stream) than has been wasted on this topic in > the last two days. Fine. Some people who use N1MM will get used to that. Now tell me how to get it to work for the people who insist on using CT and want to operate. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
Hi again,
I did get the latest programmer's reference and see to my surprise that it is more than a year old and I don't see any sign of an errata addendum. As I know for sure that there are more recent additions (such as the fine resolution S-meter request) how do I find the latest information? AB2TC - Knut PS. The below information would seem to solve the OP's problem by creating a macro using these commands.
|
|
|
In reply to this post by W8JI
> Now tell me how to get it to work for the people who insist on using > CT and want to operate. Give up on the dinosaur dung, move to Win-Test (which has an interface identical to CT) and make use of the LUA scripting capability to do the same thing there. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 11/22/2011 5:15 PM, Tom W8JI wrote: >> I know that but it takes less time to read the programmers guide and >> write the macros in AutoHotkey (add CATASC for N1MM to send the >> information in the CAT stream) than has been wasted on this topic in >> the last two days. > > Fine. Some people who use N1MM will get used to that. > > Now tell me how to get it to work for the people who insist on using CT > and want to operate. > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
Thanks for all the help, and the links to Yaesu radios by W4ZV.
73 All! Topic closed for me anyway. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <[hidden email]> To: "Tom W8JI" <[hidden email]> Cc: "Elecraft Reflector" <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 5:31 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Diversity mode preamp > >> Now tell me how to get it to work for the people who insist on using >> CT and want to operate. > > Give up on the dinosaur dung, move to Win-Test (which has an interface > identical to CT) and make use of the LUA scripting capability to do the > same thing there. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > > On 11/22/2011 5:15 PM, Tom W8JI wrote: >>> I know that but it takes less time to read the programmers guide and >>> write the macros in AutoHotkey (add CATASC for N1MM to send the >>> information in the CAT stream) than has been wasted on this topic in >>> the last two days. >> >> Fine. Some people who use N1MM will get used to that. >> >> Now tell me how to get it to work for the people who insist on using CT >> and want to operate. >> Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
«
Return to [K3]
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |