Entertaining Tales

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Entertaining Tales

Bob DeHaney
As my Elmer W4MLE told me in about 1961, Antenna and Propagation Theory are just that, theory.  Now waiting on my KX3 as we fly to IS0 next week for 15 days.  Listen for IS0/DJ0RD 😊

 

Vy 73 de Bob DJ0RD/WU5T

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Entertaining Tales

David Gilbert


Much less so now than in 1961 ... for both.

Dave   AB7E


On 9/16/2018 1:21 PM, Bob DeHaney wrote:
> As my Elmer W4MLE told me in about 1961, Antenna and Propagation Theory are just that, theory.
>  
>
> Vy 73 de Bob DJ0RD/WU5T

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Entertaining Tales

donovanf
In reply to this post by Bob DeHaney
Hi Bob,


You and W4MLE (SK) are both correct about antenna and propagation
theory, based on the universally accepted definition used in science and
engineering:


Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural
world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed
through observation and experiment.


73
Frank
W3LPL


----- Original Message -----

From: "Bob DeHaney" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 8:21:45 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Entertaining Tales

As my Elmer W4MLE told me in about 1961, Antenna and Propagation Theory are just that, theory. Now waiting on my KX3 as we fly to IS0 next week for 15 days. Listen for IS0/DJ0RD 😊



Vy 73 de Bob DJ0RD/WU5T

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm 
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net 
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
Message delivered to [hidden email]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Entertaining Tales

Don Wilhelm
If the initial post was to indicate that theory and fact were not well
aligned (That is the way I took it), then I would like to point out that
much of what was only theory in the 1960s has become more embodied in
fact in later years.

There is still a lot of mystery and mystic in propagation and sunspot
prediction, but a lot of antenna theory of the 1960's has been hardened
in science.  The foundation of electromagnetic radiation is soundly
grounded in Maxwell's Equations - but they are a difficult study all in
themselves.

I give a lot of credit to LB Cebik W4RNL (SK) for his modeling skills
and studies into antennas of various types.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 9/16/2018 6:57 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

> Hi Bob,
>
>
> You and W4MLE (SK) are both correct about antenna and propagation
> theory, based on the universally accepted definition used in science and
> engineering:
>
>
> Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural
> world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed
> through observation and experiment.
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Entertaining Tales

Bert Rollen
LB was a friend of mine and an amazing guy.  He also was a charter member and frequent presenter at our East Tennessee DX Association, and (if not already known by the list) an Elecraft K2 owner.  

Bert, K4AR

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 7:58 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Entertaining Tales

If the initial post was to indicate that theory and fact were not well aligned (That is the way I took it), then I would like to point out that much of what was only theory in the 1960s has become more embodied in fact in later years.

There is still a lot of mystery and mystic in propagation and sunspot prediction, but a lot of antenna theory of the 1960's has been hardened in science.  The foundation of electromagnetic radiation is soundly grounded in Maxwell's Equations - but they are a difficult study all in themselves.

I give a lot of credit to LB Cebik W4RNL (SK) for his modeling skills and studies into antennas of various types.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 9/16/2018 6:57 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

> Hi Bob,
>
>
> You and W4MLE (SK) are both correct about antenna and propagation
> theory, based on the universally accepted definition used in science
> and
> engineering:
>
>
> Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural
> world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed
> through observation and experiment.
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Entertaining Tales

Jim Brown-10
In reply to this post by donovanf
Exactly right.  In other words, principles that have been proven by the
scientific method. As a scientist, I have always believed that if you
think there's a difference between theory and practice, you don't know
enough about one or the other. That is, you don't understand the
problem, or you don't understand the known science. Most REAL problems
and systems are complex, whether technical or political or financial or
business.

As Don said, there ARE things that we as a civilization haven't learned
yet, and the complex effects of solar radiation are one of those things
we know SOMETHING, but not everything, about.

On the other hand, there are all sorts of things, everything from
science to politics, to interpersonal relationships to how business
works that we as individuals have not taken the time to learn, but that
ARE clearly understood by those who have taken the time to study them.
And the fact that we as individuals haven't yet learned them does not
make those things any less true.

How antennas and transmission lines work has been clearly understood by
those who have taken the time to study them for nearly 100 years. But
for someone who hasn't done that, it can seem like black magic.

73, Jim K9YC

On 9/16/2018 3:57 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

> Hi Bob,
>
>
> You and W4MLE (SK) are both correct about antenna and propagation
> theory, based on the universally accepted definition used in science and
> engineering:
>
>
> Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural
> world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed
> through observation and experiment.
>
>
> 73
> Frank
> W3LPL
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Bob DeHaney" <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 8:21:45 PM
> Subject: [Elecraft] Entertaining Tales
>
> As my Elmer W4MLE told me in about 1961, Antenna and Propagation Theory are just that, theory. Now waiting on my KX3 as we fly to IS0 next week for 15 days. Listen for IS0/DJ0RD 😊
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Entertaining Tales

ANDY DURBIN
In reply to this post by Bob DeHaney
"How antennas and transmission lines work has been clearly understood by those who have taken the time to study them for nearly 100 years."


Quite a small group then. Few with an interest in the subject would live long enough.


73,

Andy k3wyc
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]