As my Elmer W4MLE told me in about 1961, Antenna and Propagation Theory are just that, theory. Now waiting on my KX3 as we fly to IS0 next week for 15 days. Listen for IS0/DJ0RD 😊
Vy 73 de Bob DJ0RD/WU5T ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Much less so now than in 1961 ... for both. Dave  AB7E On 9/16/2018 1:21 PM, Bob DeHaney wrote: > As my Elmer W4MLE told me in about 1961, Antenna and Propagation Theory are just that, theory. > > > Vy 73 de Bob DJ0RD/WU5T ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bob DeHaney
Hi Bob,
You and W4MLE (SK) are both correct about antenna and propagation theory, based on the universally accepted definition used in science and engineering: Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. 73 Frank W3LPL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob DeHaney" <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 8:21:45 PM Subject: [Elecraft] Entertaining Tales As my Elmer W4MLE told me in about 1961, Antenna and Propagation Theory are just that, theory. Now waiting on my KX3 as we fly to IS0 next week for 15 days. Listen for IS0/DJ0RD 😊 Vy 73 de Bob DJ0RD/WU5T ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
If the initial post was to indicate that theory and fact were not well
aligned (That is the way I took it), then I would like to point out that much of what was only theory in the 1960s has become more embodied in fact in later years. There is still a lot of mystery and mystic in propagation and sunspot prediction, but a lot of antenna theory of the 1960's has been hardened in science. The foundation of electromagnetic radiation is soundly grounded in Maxwell's Equations - but they are a difficult study all in themselves. I give a lot of credit to LB Cebik W4RNL (SK) for his modeling skills and studies into antennas of various types. 73, Don W3FPR On 9/16/2018 6:57 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > Hi Bob, > > > You and W4MLE (SK) are both correct about antenna and propagation > theory, based on the universally accepted definition used in science and > engineering: > > > Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural > world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed > through observation and experiment. > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
LB was a friend of mine and an amazing guy. He also was a charter member and frequent presenter at our East Tennessee DX Association, and (if not already known by the list) an Elecraft K2 owner.
Bert, K4AR -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 7:58 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Entertaining Tales If the initial post was to indicate that theory and fact were not well aligned (That is the way I took it), then I would like to point out that much of what was only theory in the 1960s has become more embodied in fact in later years. There is still a lot of mystery and mystic in propagation and sunspot prediction, but a lot of antenna theory of the 1960's has been hardened in science. The foundation of electromagnetic radiation is soundly grounded in Maxwell's Equations - but they are a difficult study all in themselves. I give a lot of credit to LB Cebik W4RNL (SK) for his modeling skills and studies into antennas of various types. 73, Don W3FPR On 9/16/2018 6:57 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > Hi Bob, > > > You and W4MLE (SK) are both correct about antenna and propagation > theory, based on the universally accepted definition used in science > and > engineering: > > > Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural > world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed > through observation and experiment. > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by donovanf
Exactly right. In other words, principles that have been proven by the
scientific method. As a scientist, I have always believed that if you think there's a difference between theory and practice, you don't know enough about one or the other. That is, you don't understand the problem, or you don't understand the known science. Most REAL problems and systems are complex, whether technical or political or financial or business. As Don said, there ARE things that we as a civilization haven't learned yet, and the complex effects of solar radiation are one of those things we know SOMETHING, but not everything, about. On the other hand, there are all sorts of things, everything from science to politics, to interpersonal relationships to how business works that we as individuals have not taken the time to learn, but that ARE clearly understood by those who have taken the time to study them. And the fact that we as individuals haven't yet learned them does not make those things any less true. How antennas and transmission lines work has been clearly understood by those who have taken the time to study them for nearly 100 years. But for someone who hasn't done that, it can seem like black magic. 73, Jim K9YC On 9/16/2018 3:57 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > Hi Bob, > > > You and W4MLE (SK) are both correct about antenna and propagation > theory, based on the universally accepted definition used in science and > engineering: > > > Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural > world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed > through observation and experiment. > > > 73 > Frank > W3LPL > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Bob DeHaney" <[hidden email]> > To: [hidden email] > Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 8:21:45 PM > Subject: [Elecraft] Entertaining Tales > > As my Elmer W4MLE told me in about 1961, Antenna and Propagation Theory are just that, theory. Now waiting on my KX3 as we fly to IS0 next week for 15 days. Listen for IS0/DJ0RD 😊 Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bob DeHaney
"How antennas and transmission lines work has been clearly understood by those who have taken the time to study them for nearly 100 years."
Quite a small group then. Few with an interest in the subject would live long enough. 73, Andy k3wyc ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |