The DL1 50 ohm dummy load is basically composed of two 25 ohm resistors in
series. For power calculations, RF is taken off between the two resistors, rectified via a diode with a 0.3v drop. The DC is then smoothed with a .01 uf capacitor. before reaching the test point. The power calculation is then given as P(watts)=((Voltsx1.414) + 0.15)^2 / 50 I'm wanting to understand where the terms in this equation come from? I presume 0.15 is somehow related to the 0.3 Volt drop across the diode, but how is 0.15 arrived at and why not 0.3? And where does 1.414, obviously the sqrt of 2 come from - the divided voltage from the dummy load? Thanks for any enlightenment! Chip AE5KA ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Volts X 1.414 gives you peak volts.
I'm not quite sure why only half the diode voltage drop (.15) is added. I've only ever seen it all added. All that squared and divided by the impedance (50Ohms) gives you power. On 1/22/2012 12:05 PM, Chip Stratton wrote: > The DL1 50 ohm dummy load is basically composed of two 25 ohm resistors in > series. For power calculations, RF is taken off between the two resistors, > rectified via a diode with a 0.3v drop. The DC is then smoothed with a .01 > uf capacitor. before reaching the test point. > > The power calculation is then given as P(watts)=((Voltsx1.414) + 0.15)^2 / > 50 > > I'm wanting to understand where the terms in this equation come from? I > presume 0.15 is somehow related to the 0.3 Volt drop across the diode, but > how is 0.15 arrived at and why not 0.3? And where does 1.414, obviously the > sqrt of 2 come from - the divided voltage from the dummy load? > > Thanks for any enlightenment! > Chip > AE5KA > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- R. Kevin Stover AC0H ARRL FISTS #11993 SKCC #215 NAQCC #3441 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
OK, I get the 1.414 term now. The RF is sampled at the voltage divider, and
the diode/capacitor circuit rests at the peak voltage it sees - which is half what the transmitter is delivering. To get peak voltage of the RF waveform at the input to the DL1, we multiply by two. To get the RMS we then divide by 1.414. But 2/1.414 is 1.414, so we simply multiply the voltage by 1.414. Now for the 0.15 term....? Chip ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Chip Stratton
I think it can be made clearer by re-casting the equation from:
P(watts)=((Voltsx1.414) + 0.15)^2 / 50 to P(watts) = [2 x 0.707 x (Volts + 0.106)]^2 / 50 A diode rectifier is a peak detector. So you multiply by 0.707 to convert from peak to RMS and then multiply by 2 to correct for the 2:1 voltage divider. I'm not sure why only 0.1V is added to compensate for the diode voltage drop. It's true that the voltage drop is less with a high load impedance, but 0.1V seems too small. Alan N1AL On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 18:05 +0000, Chip Stratton wrote: > The DL1 50 ohm dummy load is basically composed of two 25 ohm resistors in > series. For power calculations, RF is taken off between the two resistors, > rectified via a diode with a 0.3v drop. The DC is then smoothed with a .01 > uf capacitor. before reaching the test point. > > The power calculation is then given as P(watts)=((Voltsx1.414) + 0.15)^2 / > 50 > > I'm wanting to understand where the terms in this equation come from? I > presume 0.15 is somehow related to the 0.3 Volt drop across the diode, but > how is 0.15 arrived at and why not 0.3? And where does 1.414, obviously the > sqrt of 2 come from - the divided voltage from the dummy load? > > Thanks for any enlightenment! > Chip > AE5KA > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Alan:
A couple years ago, I measured the DC output for a 1N5711 Schottky diode at 2, 10 and 21 MHz with RF input from essentially 0 to 1.8V peak (half-wave rectification). The diode operated into a high Z load (an HP digital multi-meter) and the RF was from an HP signal generator. A plot of this is at http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/diodes_for_rf_probes.htm After reading your question about the diode drop today, I ran a linear regression fit of the average of the 2, 10 and 21 MHz data, over the range starting a bit above the knee, at 0.3V peak up to the 1.8V peak. Below this point, the diode is in square law range and a simple fixed voltage drop assumption fails. Over this linear range, the Y intercept is -0.11V, with an R^2 > 0.999 and standard error of 0.00275V. Into a high Z load, therefore, 0.11V is a suitable diode offset. The actual diode offset, leaving aside unit-to-unit variations, will be a function of temperature and load impedance amongst other things. Given the other inaccuracies in the process, 0.1V is a good estimate. Jack K8ZOA On 1/22/2012 1:57 PM, Alan Bloom wrote: > I think it can be made clearer by re-casting the equation from: > > P(watts)=((Voltsx1.414) + 0.15)^2 / 50 > > to > > P(watts) = [2 x 0.707 x (Volts + 0.106)]^2 / 50 > > A diode rectifier is a peak detector. So you multiply by 0.707 to > convert from peak to RMS and then multiply by 2 to correct for the 2:1 > voltage divider. I'm not sure why only 0.1V is added to compensate for > the diode voltage drop. It's true that the voltage drop is less with a > high load impedance, but 0.1V seems too small. > > Alan N1AL > > On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 18:05 +0000, Chip Stratton wrote: >> The DL1 50 ohm dummy load is basically composed of two 25 ohm resistors in >> series. For power calculations, RF is taken off between the two resistors, >> rectified via a diode with a 0.3v drop. The DC is then smoothed with a .01 >> uf capacitor. before reaching the test point. >> >> The power calculation is then given as P(watts)=((Voltsx1.414) + 0.15)^2 / >> 50 >> >> I'm wanting to understand where the terms in this equation come from? I >> presume 0.15 is somehow related to the 0.3 Volt drop across the diode, but >> how is 0.15 arrived at and why not 0.3? And where does 1.414, obviously the >> sqrt of 2 come from - the divided voltage from the dummy load? >> >> Thanks for any enlightenment! >> Chip >> AE5KA >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Alan Bloom
Alan,
Actually the correct formula is even easier. If you note, you are squaring the 2 x .707 term, and the overall result of that is 2. So the formula becomes: P (watts) = 2(Volts + diode drop)^2/50 or even easier P (watts) = (Volts + diode drop)^2/25 Substitute whatever you think is correct for the diode drop - see Jack Smith's recent post for details. The formula above was supposed to make it into the DL2 manual at one time, but I see it has not been inserted. 73, Don W3FPR On 1/22/2012 1:57 PM, Alan Bloom wrote: > I think it can be made clearer by re-casting the equation from: > > P(watts)=((Voltsx1.414) + 0.15)^2 / 50 > > to > > P(watts) = [2 x 0.707 x (Volts + 0.106)]^2 / 50 > > A diode rectifier is a peak detector. So you multiply by 0.707 to > convert from peak to RMS and then multiply by 2 to correct for the 2:1 > voltage divider. I'm not sure why only 0.1V is added to compensate for > the diode voltage drop. It's true that the voltage drop is less with a > high load impedance, but 0.1V seems too small. > > Alan N1AL > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
OK, thanks everyone for the education. This came up because I wanted to
build an RF detector to use with a multimeter as an RF field strength meter to compare different ground/counterpoise schemes for HF on a boat. I ended up copying the circuit for the MFJ-802 field strength meter, which puts a load of 1 meg across a 1n270 diode bridge. Using a .3 volt drop assumption for those diodes gives a very linear correlation of voltage versus transmitted power in the near field. So the .15 volt assumption in the dummy load calc was a puzzle to me. AE5KA Chip ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Jack Smith-6
Jack,
Interesting. I didn't realize it was a Schottky diode. But it makes sense. Using the rule that the current increases by e (2.718) for every 26 mV change in forward voltage: If you assume that the forward voltage drop is 0.3V at (let's say) 1 mA forward current, then at 1 uA (1V into a 1M load), the voltage should drop by a factor of 0.026V x ln(1000) = 0.18V. 0.3 - 0.18 = 0.12V, pretty close. With a silicon diode the answer would be something like 0.6 - 0.18V = 0.42V. That's why Schottky-diode detectors have better linearity. Alan N1AL On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 14:21 -0500, Jack Smith wrote: > Alan: > > A couple years ago, I measured the DC output for a 1N5711 Schottky diode > at 2, 10 and 21 MHz with RF input from essentially 0 to 1.8V peak > (half-wave rectification). The diode operated into a high Z load (an HP > digital multi-meter) and the RF was from an HP signal generator. > > A plot of this is at > http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/diodes_for_rf_probes.htm > > After reading your question about the diode drop today, I ran a linear > regression fit of the average of the 2, 10 and 21 MHz data, over the > range starting a bit above the knee, at 0.3V peak up to the 1.8V peak. > Below this point, the diode is in square law range and a simple fixed > voltage drop assumption fails. > > Over this linear range, the Y intercept is -0.11V, with an R^2 > 0.999 > and standard error of 0.00275V. > > Into a high Z load, therefore, 0.11V is a suitable diode offset. The > actual diode offset, leaving aside unit-to-unit variations, will be a > function of temperature and load impedance amongst other things. Given > the other inaccuracies in the process, 0.1V is a good estimate. > > Jack K8ZOA > > > On 1/22/2012 1:57 PM, Alan Bloom wrote: > > I think it can be made clearer by re-casting the equation from: > > > > P(watts)=((Voltsx1.414) + 0.15)^2 / 50 > > > > to > > > > P(watts) = [2 x 0.707 x (Volts + 0.106)]^2 / 50 > > > > A diode rectifier is a peak detector. So you multiply by 0.707 to > > convert from peak to RMS and then multiply by 2 to correct for the 2:1 > > voltage divider. I'm not sure why only 0.1V is added to compensate for > > the diode voltage drop. It's true that the voltage drop is less with a > > high load impedance, but 0.1V seems too small. > > > > Alan N1AL > > > > On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 18:05 +0000, Chip Stratton wrote: > >> The DL1 50 ohm dummy load is basically composed of two 25 ohm resistors in > >> series. For power calculations, RF is taken off between the two resistors, > >> rectified via a diode with a 0.3v drop. The DC is then smoothed with a .01 > >> uf capacitor. before reaching the test point. > >> > >> The power calculation is then given as P(watts)=((Voltsx1.414) + 0.15)^2 / > >> 50 > >> > >> I'm wanting to understand where the terms in this equation come from? I > >> presume 0.15 is somehow related to the 0.3 Volt drop across the diode, but > >> how is 0.15 arrived at and why not 0.3? And where does 1.414, obviously the > >> sqrt of 2 come from - the divided voltage from the dummy load? > >> > >> Thanks for any enlightenment! > >> Chip > >> AE5KA > >> ______________________________________________________________ > >> Elecraft mailing list > >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] > >> > >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > >> > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |